Approaching Apprenticeship in Nepal: Lessons from Dual-VET of Germany

P. Paudel, Christiane S. Eberhardt
{"title":"Approaching Apprenticeship in Nepal: Lessons from Dual-VET of Germany","authors":"P. Paudel, Christiane S. Eberhardt","doi":"10.3126/tvet.v17i1.52405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Apprenticeship training is geared towards meeting the demands of labor market which also ensures self-esteem, employability and vocational career development for the individuals. Against this background, apprenticeship is seen as a successful model for grooming the labor force and reducing youth unemployment. In this paper, we map the current state-of-the-art of apprenticeship in Nepal against the dual system of VET in Germany. The central question in our reflection is how common ownership can be established through responsibility sharing in countries, where other governance principles apply and the governance models also differ from the German model. Hence, in the first step, we focus on the origins of vocational training in both countries. We show that the development of apprenticeship has been driven by social, political and industrial needs, thereby getting deeply rooted in society. We show that despite many challenges, dual training in Germany is an important educational pathway for young people to access the labor market and a backbone of the economy. This is different in Nepal, where despite the governance structures that have been created in the meantime, apprenticeship training is struggling for recognition among the leaders, and actors in the economy. We end up adopting the \"six central pillars for successful quality apprenticeships\" (i.e. meaningful social dialogue, robust regulatory framework, clear roles and responsibilities, equitable funding, strong labor market and inclusiveness) developed by the ILO (2017). We reflect on them with reference to the Nepali case and in the shadow of the German experiences. In our conclusion, we propose to add \"consideration of the country context\" as the seventh important pillar for qualitative apprenticeship to ensure sustainable development – free of external funding and support.","PeriodicalId":298944,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technical and Vocational Education and Training","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technical and Vocational Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/tvet.v17i1.52405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Apprenticeship training is geared towards meeting the demands of labor market which also ensures self-esteem, employability and vocational career development for the individuals. Against this background, apprenticeship is seen as a successful model for grooming the labor force and reducing youth unemployment. In this paper, we map the current state-of-the-art of apprenticeship in Nepal against the dual system of VET in Germany. The central question in our reflection is how common ownership can be established through responsibility sharing in countries, where other governance principles apply and the governance models also differ from the German model. Hence, in the first step, we focus on the origins of vocational training in both countries. We show that the development of apprenticeship has been driven by social, political and industrial needs, thereby getting deeply rooted in society. We show that despite many challenges, dual training in Germany is an important educational pathway for young people to access the labor market and a backbone of the economy. This is different in Nepal, where despite the governance structures that have been created in the meantime, apprenticeship training is struggling for recognition among the leaders, and actors in the economy. We end up adopting the "six central pillars for successful quality apprenticeships" (i.e. meaningful social dialogue, robust regulatory framework, clear roles and responsibilities, equitable funding, strong labor market and inclusiveness) developed by the ILO (2017). We reflect on them with reference to the Nepali case and in the shadow of the German experiences. In our conclusion, we propose to add "consideration of the country context" as the seventh important pillar for qualitative apprenticeship to ensure sustainable development – free of external funding and support.
尼泊尔的学徒制:德国双职业教育的经验教训
学徒培训旨在满足劳动力市场的需求,同时也确保个人的自尊、就业能力和职业生涯发展。在这种背景下,学徒制被视为培养劳动力和减少青年失业的成功模式。在本文中,我们将尼泊尔目前最先进的学徒制与德国的双重职业教育培训体系进行了对比。我们反思的核心问题是,在适用其他治理原则、治理模式也与德国模式不同的国家中,如何通过责任分担来建立共同所有权。因此,在第一步,我们把重点放在两国职业培训的起源上。我们表明,学徒制的发展是由社会、政治和工业需求驱动的,因此深深植根于社会。我们表明,尽管面临许多挑战,德国的双元制培训是年轻人进入劳动力市场和经济支柱的重要教育途径。尼泊尔的情况有所不同,尽管在此期间已经建立了治理结构,但学徒培训仍在努力争取领导人和经济参与者的认可。我们最终采纳了国际劳工组织(2017年)制定的“成功高质量学徒制的六大核心支柱”(即有意义的社会对话、健全的监管框架、明确的角色和责任、公平的资金、强大的劳动力市场和包容性)。我们参照尼泊尔的情况并在德国经验的阴影下反思这些问题。在我们的结论中,我们建议将“考虑国情”作为质量学徒制的第七个重要支柱,以确保可持续发展——不需要外部资金和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信