Law and Culture

Francis Cardinal George
{"title":"Law and Culture","authors":"Francis Cardinal George","doi":"10.2307/j.ctvwcjhw8.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A little more than a century ago, Oliver Wendell Holmes took up a task something like mine today. On January 8, 1897, Holmes dedicated a new law school building, and took the measure of law and culture at the turn of a century. Holmes spoke in Boston, at the university of that name. His lecture went into the books as “The Path of the Law” and became a classic of legal literature. Of course, I do not pretend to be the towering figure that Holmes was. He was over six feet tall; besides, I am not even a lawyer. Still, I am grateful for the opportunity to come to this new law school, important in its founding and in its promise, to offer some reflections on law and its relation to culture in this new century. Perhaps I should preface my remarks by noting a few differences between what Justice Holmes did at Boston University and what I intend to do here at Ave Maria. First, measured by the text published in the Harvard Law Review, Holmes spoke that chilly day in Boston for about two hours. I will not, at least, not quite. Second, Holmes placed before his audience the proposition that “the man of the future is the man of statistics and the master of economics.” My view is very different. While I do not belittle statistics and economics or deny their importance in the law, what I wish to urge today upon lawyers, law professors, and law students is reflection on fundamental moral truths: truths that are by nature irreducible to numbers and resistant to calculation. What Holmes did, and what I am here to do, differ in still another way: my charge is to consecrate to God, as well as to dedicate to human purpose, a law building. From what we know","PeriodicalId":320227,"journal":{"name":"Law and Justice around the World","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Justice around the World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvwcjhw8.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A little more than a century ago, Oliver Wendell Holmes took up a task something like mine today. On January 8, 1897, Holmes dedicated a new law school building, and took the measure of law and culture at the turn of a century. Holmes spoke in Boston, at the university of that name. His lecture went into the books as “The Path of the Law” and became a classic of legal literature. Of course, I do not pretend to be the towering figure that Holmes was. He was over six feet tall; besides, I am not even a lawyer. Still, I am grateful for the opportunity to come to this new law school, important in its founding and in its promise, to offer some reflections on law and its relation to culture in this new century. Perhaps I should preface my remarks by noting a few differences between what Justice Holmes did at Boston University and what I intend to do here at Ave Maria. First, measured by the text published in the Harvard Law Review, Holmes spoke that chilly day in Boston for about two hours. I will not, at least, not quite. Second, Holmes placed before his audience the proposition that “the man of the future is the man of statistics and the master of economics.” My view is very different. While I do not belittle statistics and economics or deny their importance in the law, what I wish to urge today upon lawyers, law professors, and law students is reflection on fundamental moral truths: truths that are by nature irreducible to numbers and resistant to calculation. What Holmes did, and what I am here to do, differ in still another way: my charge is to consecrate to God, as well as to dedicate to human purpose, a law building. From what we know
法律与文化
一个多世纪以前,奥利弗·温德尔·霍姆斯(Oliver Wendell Holmes)接受了一项类似于我今天的任务。1897年1月8日,福尔摩斯为新的法学院大楼揭幕,并在世纪之交对法律和文化进行了衡量。福尔摩斯在波士顿的一所大学发表了演讲。他的演讲被编入《法律之路》一书,成为法律文学的经典。当然,我并不像福尔摩斯那样自命不凡。他身高超过六英尺;再说,我根本不是律师。尽管如此,我还是很感激有机会来到这所新的法学院,对它的建立和承诺都很重要,对新世纪的法律及其与文化的关系提出一些思考。也许我应该在发言之前指出霍姆斯法官在波士顿大学所做的与我打算在圣母颂所做的有一些不同。首先,从发表在《哈佛法律评论》(Harvard Law Review)上的文字来看,霍尔姆斯在波士顿那个寒冷的日子里讲了大约两个小时。我不会,至少不会。其次,福尔摩斯向他的听众提出了这样一个命题:“未来的人是统计学家和经济学大师。”我的观点非常不同。虽然我并不是贬低统计学和经济学,也不是否认它们在法律中的重要性,但我今天希望敦促律师、法学教授和法学学生反思基本的道德真理:这些真理本质上是不能简化为数字的,而且是不容计算的。福尔摩斯所做的和我在这里所要做的还有另一种不同:我的职责是把一座法律大楼奉献给上帝,同时也奉献给人类。据我们所知
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信