Statistical properties of Hipparcos 2, caveats on its use, and a recalibration of the Intermediate Astrometric Data

G. M. Brandt, D. Michalik, Timothy D. Brandt
{"title":"Statistical properties of Hipparcos 2, caveats on its use, and a recalibration of the Intermediate Astrometric Data","authors":"G. M. Brandt, D. Michalik, Timothy D. Brandt","doi":"10.1093/rasti/rzad011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We revisit the Hipparcos 2007 re-reduction and find improvements to the catalog by leveraging Gaia EDR3. We show that including a constant residual offset and additional dispersion (two free parameters in total) in the Hipparcos 2007 IAD creates a new catalog with significantly better agreement with Gaia EDR3. The astrometric parameters, after recalibration, have z-scores that follow a unit-Gaussian when measured against Gaia EDR3 values. We have expanded the Python astrometry tool, htof, to recalibrate the IAD on-the-fly. On a second front, we find that a merged set of IAD from the 1997 and 2007 Hipparcos reductions is not possible in an internally consistent manner. This can be understood if Hipparcos 2007 is an improved, but overfit, model to the underlying along-scan data. For this reason, we recommend using the recalibrated Hipparcos 2007 astrometric parameters, or those from the Hipparcos-Gaia Catalog of Accelerations – because the signatures of overfitting are calibrated out. We advise caution in fitting orbits to the IAD from either Hipparcos 2 as-published or the recalibrated version presented here.","PeriodicalId":367327,"journal":{"name":"RAS Techniques and Instruments","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RAS Techniques and Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rasti/rzad011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We revisit the Hipparcos 2007 re-reduction and find improvements to the catalog by leveraging Gaia EDR3. We show that including a constant residual offset and additional dispersion (two free parameters in total) in the Hipparcos 2007 IAD creates a new catalog with significantly better agreement with Gaia EDR3. The astrometric parameters, after recalibration, have z-scores that follow a unit-Gaussian when measured against Gaia EDR3 values. We have expanded the Python astrometry tool, htof, to recalibrate the IAD on-the-fly. On a second front, we find that a merged set of IAD from the 1997 and 2007 Hipparcos reductions is not possible in an internally consistent manner. This can be understood if Hipparcos 2007 is an improved, but overfit, model to the underlying along-scan data. For this reason, we recommend using the recalibrated Hipparcos 2007 astrometric parameters, or those from the Hipparcos-Gaia Catalog of Accelerations – because the signatures of overfitting are calibrated out. We advise caution in fitting orbits to the IAD from either Hipparcos 2 as-published or the recalibrated version presented here.
Hipparcos 2的统计特性,对其使用的注意事项,以及中间天文测量数据的重新校准
我们回顾了喜巴可思2007年的重新减少,并通过利用Gaia EDR3找到了对目录的改进。我们发现,在Hipparcos 2007 IAD中包含恒定的剩余偏移量和额外的色散(总共两个自由参数)创建了一个与Gaia EDR3明显更一致的新目录。天体测量参数,在重新校准后,有z分数遵循单位高斯当测量盖亚EDR3值。我们已经扩展了Python天文测量工具,以实时重新校准IAD。在第二条战线上,我们发现合并1997年和2007年喜巴可思削减的内部制内部制是不可能以内部一致的方式实现的。如果Hipparcos 2007是一个改进的但过拟合的模型,可以理解这一点。出于这个原因,我们建议使用重新校准的Hipparcos 2007天文测量参数,或者来自Hipparcos- gaia加速目录的参数,因为过度拟合的特征是经过校准的。我们建议在根据已发表的Hipparcos 2或本文提出的重新校准版本将轨道拟合到IAD时要谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信