Regulating the Prices and Costs of Medicines in the United Kingdom

David G Taylor
{"title":"Regulating the Prices and Costs of Medicines in the United Kingdom","authors":"David G Taylor","doi":"10.1300/J371v12n03_03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pharmaceutical price and overall cost controls in the UK (which represents 4% of the world medicines market) are aimed at containing NHS medicines spending, while also permitting the development of the research based pharmaceutical industry. The non-statutory Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS) allows free pricing of new patented medicines (generic medicine prices are controlled separately). But it limits profits from NHS sales, and the amounts spent on activities such as research and promotion. The ratio of industry R&D to promotion costs incurred within the NHS market is 3:1. Elsewhere in the world more is often spent on promotion than on research. On the demand side the NHS imposes direct and indirect budgetary restraints on prescribers. These have been coupled with positive incentives for economic medicines purchasing and prescribing. Some 80 per cent of all NHS prescriptions are now written generically. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) works to clarify and ensure NHS patients' rights to access to medical and other treatments. Britain has arguably been successful in containing domestic medicines spending while permitting research based pharmaceutical companies to prosper, and contribute a £2 billion export surplus. The increasing sophistication of NHS medicines management and the demands of the single European market are in the future likely to lead to a reduced role for the PPRS. However, it will probably be preserved in a modified form after it is renegotiated in 2004/05. © 2003 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":286701,"journal":{"name":"International Drug Regulatory Mechanisms","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Drug Regulatory Mechanisms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J371v12n03_03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pharmaceutical price and overall cost controls in the UK (which represents 4% of the world medicines market) are aimed at containing NHS medicines spending, while also permitting the development of the research based pharmaceutical industry. The non-statutory Pharmaceutical Price Regulation Scheme (PPRS) allows free pricing of new patented medicines (generic medicine prices are controlled separately). But it limits profits from NHS sales, and the amounts spent on activities such as research and promotion. The ratio of industry R&D to promotion costs incurred within the NHS market is 3:1. Elsewhere in the world more is often spent on promotion than on research. On the demand side the NHS imposes direct and indirect budgetary restraints on prescribers. These have been coupled with positive incentives for economic medicines purchasing and prescribing. Some 80 per cent of all NHS prescriptions are now written generically. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) works to clarify and ensure NHS patients' rights to access to medical and other treatments. Britain has arguably been successful in containing domestic medicines spending while permitting research based pharmaceutical companies to prosper, and contribute a £2 billion export surplus. The increasing sophistication of NHS medicines management and the demands of the single European market are in the future likely to lead to a reduced role for the PPRS. However, it will probably be preserved in a modified form after it is renegotiated in 2004/05. © 2003 by The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.
英国对药品价格和成本的监管
英国的药品价格和总体成本控制(占世界药品市场的 4%)旨在控制国家医疗服务体系的药品支出,同时允许以研究为基础的制药业的发展。非法定的 "药品价格管理计划"(PPRS)允许新专利药品的自由定价(非专利药品的价格单独控制)。但它限制了国家医疗服务体系的销售利润,以及用于研究和推广等活动的费用。在 NHS 市场上,行业研发费用与推广费用的比例为 3:1。在世界其他地方,推广费用往往比研究费用高。在需求方面,国家医疗服务体系对处方者实行直接和间接的预算限制。与此同时,国家医疗服务体系还对药品采购和处方的经济性采取积极的激励措施。目前,约 80% 的 NHS 处方都是通用名药。国家临床卓越研究所(NICE)致力于澄清和确保国民保健服务体系的患者获得医疗和其他治疗的权利。可以说,英国成功地控制了国内药品开支,同时允许以研究为基础的制药公司蓬勃发展,并带来了 20 亿英镑的出口盈余。随着英国国家医疗服务体系药品管理的日趋完善以及欧洲单一市场的需求,《药品采购策略》在未来的作用可能会减弱。不过,在 2004/2005 年重新谈判之后,它很可能会以一种修改后的形式保留下来。© 2003 哈沃斯出版社版权所有。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信