{"title":"Inter-domain Mobility with LISP-MN -- A Performance Comparison with MIPv6","authors":"Musab Isah, C. Edwards","doi":"10.1109/WMNC.2015.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we aim to evaluate Locator Identifier Separation Protocol-Mobile Node's (LISP-MN) performance in an inter-domain mobility scenario for both multi-interface and single interface Mobile Node (MN) with focus on throughput, handover delay, service disruption time and packet loss. To serve as the benchmark for performance, we compare LISP-MN with the IETF standardised MIPv6. We implement the 2 protocols on a laboratory test bed comprising all the nodes necessary for their operation. For multi-interface MNs, LISP-MN shows a better response in soft handover scenarios in terms of throughput and packet loss. MIPv6 on the other hand shows shorter handover delay with lower service disruption time in a hard handover scenario. Both protocols demonstrate poor performance for a single interface MN due to the long handover delay experienced. Although LISP-MN's handover control messages doubled that of MIPv6, our experiments show that it takes a similar time as MIPv6 to complete the handover message exchange.","PeriodicalId":240086,"journal":{"name":"2015 8th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 8th IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WMNC.2015.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
In this work, we aim to evaluate Locator Identifier Separation Protocol-Mobile Node's (LISP-MN) performance in an inter-domain mobility scenario for both multi-interface and single interface Mobile Node (MN) with focus on throughput, handover delay, service disruption time and packet loss. To serve as the benchmark for performance, we compare LISP-MN with the IETF standardised MIPv6. We implement the 2 protocols on a laboratory test bed comprising all the nodes necessary for their operation. For multi-interface MNs, LISP-MN shows a better response in soft handover scenarios in terms of throughput and packet loss. MIPv6 on the other hand shows shorter handover delay with lower service disruption time in a hard handover scenario. Both protocols demonstrate poor performance for a single interface MN due to the long handover delay experienced. Although LISP-MN's handover control messages doubled that of MIPv6, our experiments show that it takes a similar time as MIPv6 to complete the handover message exchange.