{"title":"From Heineken with Love: James Bond Product Promotion","authors":"Lalin Anik, J. Miles","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3017473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The producers of the newest James Bond film, Spectre, had a difficult sponsorship decision to make before filming of the movie began in one month. Up for consideration was a highly lucrative product promotion with Heineken, which offered both a sizable contribution to the film as well as a high-budget advertising campaign. The studio was looking for any way it could to reduce the cost of the film (which was nearing $250 million), but the producers were concerned about the negative backlash they had unwittingly unleashed when they'd shown Bond drinking a Heineken in Skyfall, as opposed to his usual vodka martini. How should the producers approach the Heineken deal? How could they assess the benefits and risks of associating Bond with a Dutch beer? This potential tension between brand cultures allows for a rich discussion. Furthermore, the case introduces the concept of \"cool\" and challenges the students to dive deeper into understanding its four dimensions to answer questions such as \"What makes James Bond cool?\" \"Can James Bond be uncool?\" and \"How can the brand sustain its coolness in partnership with potentially conflicting brands?\"This case is appropriate for use both in a first-year marketing course as well as a higher-level elective with MBAs and executives. This case would be most impactful if taught along with the technical note \"A General Theory of Coolness\" (UVA-M-0953), as the framework therein could be applied to expand the current discussion. \nExcerpt \nUVA-M-0952 \nRev. Dec. 6, 2017 \nFrom Heineken with Love: James Bond Product Promotion \nThe producers of the newest James Bond film, Spectre, had a difficult decision to make before filming began in one month. Expectations for the follow-up to Skyfall, the most successful Bond film ever at the box office, were incredibly high among fans and the film industry. Spectre would have to be bigger and better, with a larger budget as well. While Bond was a fan favorite, not every Bond movie had done well in the theaters, and Spectre's budget of around $ 250million made it hugely expensive and potentially risky. The studio was looking for any way it could to reduce the cost of the film without sacrificing the audience experience. \nUp for consideration was a highly lucrative product promotion. Heineken was hoping to continue its long-running sponsorship of the series. In return for featuring its beer in Spectre, it was willing to make a sizeable contribution to the film. It would also pledge to spend $ 100million to cross-promote its beer and the movie with a flashy advertising campaign. Nevertheless, the producers were concerned about the negative backlash they had unwittingly unleashed when they'd shown Bond drinking a Heineken in Skyfall, as opposed to his usual vodka martini. \nHow should the producers approach the Heineken deal? How could they assess the benefits and risks of associating Bond with a Dutch beer? \n. . .","PeriodicalId":121773,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3017473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The producers of the newest James Bond film, Spectre, had a difficult sponsorship decision to make before filming of the movie began in one month. Up for consideration was a highly lucrative product promotion with Heineken, which offered both a sizable contribution to the film as well as a high-budget advertising campaign. The studio was looking for any way it could to reduce the cost of the film (which was nearing $250 million), but the producers were concerned about the negative backlash they had unwittingly unleashed when they'd shown Bond drinking a Heineken in Skyfall, as opposed to his usual vodka martini. How should the producers approach the Heineken deal? How could they assess the benefits and risks of associating Bond with a Dutch beer? This potential tension between brand cultures allows for a rich discussion. Furthermore, the case introduces the concept of "cool" and challenges the students to dive deeper into understanding its four dimensions to answer questions such as "What makes James Bond cool?" "Can James Bond be uncool?" and "How can the brand sustain its coolness in partnership with potentially conflicting brands?"This case is appropriate for use both in a first-year marketing course as well as a higher-level elective with MBAs and executives. This case would be most impactful if taught along with the technical note "A General Theory of Coolness" (UVA-M-0953), as the framework therein could be applied to expand the current discussion.
Excerpt
UVA-M-0952
Rev. Dec. 6, 2017
From Heineken with Love: James Bond Product Promotion
The producers of the newest James Bond film, Spectre, had a difficult decision to make before filming began in one month. Expectations for the follow-up to Skyfall, the most successful Bond film ever at the box office, were incredibly high among fans and the film industry. Spectre would have to be bigger and better, with a larger budget as well. While Bond was a fan favorite, not every Bond movie had done well in the theaters, and Spectre's budget of around $ 250million made it hugely expensive and potentially risky. The studio was looking for any way it could to reduce the cost of the film without sacrificing the audience experience.
Up for consideration was a highly lucrative product promotion. Heineken was hoping to continue its long-running sponsorship of the series. In return for featuring its beer in Spectre, it was willing to make a sizeable contribution to the film. It would also pledge to spend $ 100million to cross-promote its beer and the movie with a flashy advertising campaign. Nevertheless, the producers were concerned about the negative backlash they had unwittingly unleashed when they'd shown Bond drinking a Heineken in Skyfall, as opposed to his usual vodka martini.
How should the producers approach the Heineken deal? How could they assess the benefits and risks of associating Bond with a Dutch beer?
. . .