Sustainable development goals assessment in supply chain design from an operation research perspective: Social, governmental, and technological aspects

Andrea Teresa Espinoza Pérez, Óscar C. Vásquez
{"title":"Sustainable development goals assessment in supply chain design from an operation research perspective: Social, governmental, and technological aspects","authors":"Andrea Teresa Espinoza Pérez, Óscar C. Vásquez","doi":"10.1109/ICECCME55909.2022.9988349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an exponential increase in research seeking sustainability in the supply chain design since 2010, emerging the called sustainable supply chain design (SSCD). Furthermore, new approaches consider sustainability integrates governmental and technological aspects to the classic assessment including economic, environmental, and social dimensions. This research tendency has implied a broad and diverse set of metrics and resolution method approaches to address each sustainability dimension in the search for an optimal design. This implies new significant problems to be considered. It implies several possible metrics combinations for the SSCD since there is no agreement among researchers on which metrics represent better, or to a greater extent, each sustainability dimension sustainability and even how to depict the concept of sustainability itself in the supply chain design. Considering the new approaches and social dimension is underrepresented in the majority of literature cases, we want to contribute the understanding of how social, governmental, and technological dimensions have been assessed in optimal SSCD. Our proposal is based on an extensive literature review from a total of 541 analyzed articles, which allows us to represent and identify the different metrics. We distinguish nineteen metrics from the different sustainability dimensions.","PeriodicalId":202568,"journal":{"name":"2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECCME55909.2022.9988349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is an exponential increase in research seeking sustainability in the supply chain design since 2010, emerging the called sustainable supply chain design (SSCD). Furthermore, new approaches consider sustainability integrates governmental and technological aspects to the classic assessment including economic, environmental, and social dimensions. This research tendency has implied a broad and diverse set of metrics and resolution method approaches to address each sustainability dimension in the search for an optimal design. This implies new significant problems to be considered. It implies several possible metrics combinations for the SSCD since there is no agreement among researchers on which metrics represent better, or to a greater extent, each sustainability dimension sustainability and even how to depict the concept of sustainability itself in the supply chain design. Considering the new approaches and social dimension is underrepresented in the majority of literature cases, we want to contribute the understanding of how social, governmental, and technological dimensions have been assessed in optimal SSCD. Our proposal is based on an extensive literature review from a total of 541 analyzed articles, which allows us to represent and identify the different metrics. We distinguish nineteen metrics from the different sustainability dimensions.
运筹学视角下供应链设计中的可持续发展目标评估:社会、政府和技术层面
自2010年以来,在供应链设计中寻求可持续性的研究呈指数增长,出现了所谓的可持续供应链设计(SSCD)。此外,新的方法认为可持续性将政府和技术方面整合到传统的评估中,包括经济、环境和社会方面。这种研究趋势暗示了一套广泛而多样的指标和解决方法,以解决在寻找最佳设计的每个可持续性维度。这意味着需要考虑新的重大问题。这意味着SSCD的几种可能的指标组合,因为研究人员之间没有就哪个指标更好地代表或在更大程度上代表每个可持续性维度的可持续性,甚至如何在供应链设计中描述可持续性概念本身达成一致。考虑到新方法和社会维度在大多数文献案例中未被充分代表,我们希望对社会、政府和技术维度如何在最佳SSCD中进行评估做出贡献。我们的建议是基于从541篇分析文章中广泛的文献综述,这使我们能够表示和识别不同的指标。我们从不同的可持续性维度中区分出19个指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信