On the early history of moduli and Teichm{ü}ller spaces

N. A'campo, L. Ji, A. Papadopoulos
{"title":"On the early history of moduli and Teichm{ü}ller spaces","authors":"N. A'campo, L. Ji, A. Papadopoulos","doi":"10.1090/mbk/093/13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We survey some major contributions to Riemann's moduli space and Teichm{\\\"u}ller space. Our report has a historical character, but the stress is on the chain of mathematical ideas. We start with the introduction of Riemann surfaces, and we end with the discovery of some of the basic structures of Riemann's moduli space and Teichm{\\\"u}ller space. We point out several facts which seem to be unknown to many algebraic geometers and analysts working in the theory. The period we are interested in starts with Riemann, in 1851, and ends in the early 1960s, when Ahlfors and Bers confirmed that Teichm{\\\"u}ller's results were correct.This paper was written for the book \"Lipman Bers, a life in Mathematics,\" edited by Linda Keen , Irwin Kra and Rubi Rodriguez (Amercian Mathematical Society, 2015). It is dedicated to the memory of Lipman Bers who was above all a complex analyst and spent a large part of his life and energy working on the analytic structure of Teichm{\\\"u}ller space. His work on analysis is nevertheless inseparable from geometry and topology. In this survey, we highlight the relations and the logical dependence between this work and the works of Riemann, Poincar{\\'e}, Klein, Brouwer, Siegel, Teichm{\\\"u}ller, Weil, Grothendieck and others. We explain the motivation behind the ideas. In doing so, we point out several facts which seem to be unknown to many Teichm{\\\"u}ller theorists.","PeriodicalId":429168,"journal":{"name":"arXiv: History and Overview","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv: History and Overview","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1090/mbk/093/13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

We survey some major contributions to Riemann's moduli space and Teichm{\"u}ller space. Our report has a historical character, but the stress is on the chain of mathematical ideas. We start with the introduction of Riemann surfaces, and we end with the discovery of some of the basic structures of Riemann's moduli space and Teichm{\"u}ller space. We point out several facts which seem to be unknown to many algebraic geometers and analysts working in the theory. The period we are interested in starts with Riemann, in 1851, and ends in the early 1960s, when Ahlfors and Bers confirmed that Teichm{\"u}ller's results were correct.This paper was written for the book "Lipman Bers, a life in Mathematics," edited by Linda Keen , Irwin Kra and Rubi Rodriguez (Amercian Mathematical Society, 2015). It is dedicated to the memory of Lipman Bers who was above all a complex analyst and spent a large part of his life and energy working on the analytic structure of Teichm{\"u}ller space. His work on analysis is nevertheless inseparable from geometry and topology. In this survey, we highlight the relations and the logical dependence between this work and the works of Riemann, Poincar{\'e}, Klein, Brouwer, Siegel, Teichm{\"u}ller, Weil, Grothendieck and others. We explain the motivation behind the ideas. In doing so, we point out several facts which seem to be unknown to many Teichm{\"u}ller theorists.
论模和Teichm{ü}ller空间的早期历史
本文综述了黎曼模空间和泰奇姆空间的一些重要贡献。我们的报告具有历史性质,但重点是数学思想的链条。我们从黎曼曲面的介绍开始,并以黎曼模空间和泰希姆勒空间的一些基本结构的发现结束。我们指出了几个事实,这似乎是许多代数几何学者和分析在理论工作不知道。我们感兴趣的时期从1851年黎曼开始,到20世纪60年代初结束,当时阿尔福斯和贝尔斯证实了泰希姆勒的结果是正确的。本文是为Linda Keen, Irwin Kra和Rubi Rodriguez编辑的《Lipman Bers, a life in Mathematics》(美国数学学会,2015)一书撰写的。它是为了纪念李普曼·伯斯,他首先是一个复杂的分析家,他的大部分生命和精力都花在了研究泰希姆空间的分析结构上。然而,他在分析方面的工作与几何学和拓扑学密不可分。在这篇综述中,我们强调了这部作品与黎曼、庞加莱、克莱因、布劳维尔、西格尔、泰希姆勒、韦尔、格罗滕迪克等人的作品之间的关系和逻辑依赖。我们解释这些想法背后的动机。在这样做的过程中,我们指出了许多泰希姆勒理论家似乎不知道的几个事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信