The fundamental differences in the principles governing Property Law and Succession from a South African Law perspective

J. Sonnekus
{"title":"The fundamental differences in the principles governing Property Law and Succession from a South African Law perspective","authors":"J. Sonnekus","doi":"10.1515/EPLJ-2014-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South African law is un-codified, developed, Roman-Dutch law. As such it is founded on a strict adherence to well-defined principles and the logical application of these principles guarantees legal certainty. This strict adherence to principles also vouches for an aversion against a pragmatic, casuistic and utterly uncertain mercy of a judicial sense of presumed fairness and equity. Judges are supposed to know the difference between being seated on a bench under a palm tree, pronouncing according to the current sense of what may be equitable according to the flavour of the day and sitting on a bench in a court of law and finding the legal principles that govern the case at hand.","PeriodicalId":338086,"journal":{"name":"European Property Law Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Property Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/EPLJ-2014-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

South African law is un-codified, developed, Roman-Dutch law. As such it is founded on a strict adherence to well-defined principles and the logical application of these principles guarantees legal certainty. This strict adherence to principles also vouches for an aversion against a pragmatic, casuistic and utterly uncertain mercy of a judicial sense of presumed fairness and equity. Judges are supposed to know the difference between being seated on a bench under a palm tree, pronouncing according to the current sense of what may be equitable according to the flavour of the day and sitting on a bench in a court of law and finding the legal principles that govern the case at hand.
从南非法律的角度看物权法和继承原则的根本区别
南非法律是非编纂的、发达的罗马-荷兰法。因此,它建立在严格遵守明确规定的原则的基础上,这些原则的合理适用保证了法律的确定性。这种对原则的严格遵守也证明了对一种务实的、诡辩的、完全不确定的、假定的公平和公平的司法意义上的仁慈的厌恶。法官应该知道,坐在棕榈树下的长凳上,根据当时的气氛,根据当前的感觉,宣布什么可能是公平的,而坐在法庭的长凳上,找到管辖手头案件的法律原则,这两者之间的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信