{"title":"BRIDGING THE TECHNOLOGY GAP IN HEALTH CARE: DEVELOPING A MODEL TO BETTER HELP THOSE WHO HELP OTHERS","authors":"G. Hembroff, M. Matos","doi":"10.17267/2317-3386BJMHH.V4I4.1125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over recent years, there has been a significant increase of integrated computing devices and systems within the healthcare sector, including computerized machines which can see deep within the human body to detect illnesses previously missed, help engage the patient, provide enhanced education, and access medical data not readily accessible before. However, as new technologies, medications, treatments, and procedures are being developed rapidly, clinicians are expected to incorporate this new information into their daily practices, apply this knowledge to their patients, track each patient’s individual health status and background, while communicating quickly with patients, hospitals, and other providers. Additionally, clinicians are expected to keep up with the latest published medical data in the hopes of increasing the accuracy of diagnoses and treatments to improve patient health outcomes. However, there is a “small” problem with this expectation, there is not enough hours in a day to accomplish all of these tasks. According to a report by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, it would take at least 160 hours (or four 40-hour work weeks) of reading every single week just to keep up with new medical knowledge as it’s published, let alone applying the effort to consider its relevance or to implement it practically. This places false expectations on clinicians. While they may be an experienced doctor, they still require a process which delivers functional, meaningful, efficient, and user-friendly technology to their daily work environment. Therefore, it is important to develop a methodology to support and compliment the recent strategy of health care delivery and payments.","PeriodicalId":280405,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Medicine and Human Health","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Medicine and Human Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17267/2317-3386BJMHH.V4I4.1125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over recent years, there has been a significant increase of integrated computing devices and systems within the healthcare sector, including computerized machines which can see deep within the human body to detect illnesses previously missed, help engage the patient, provide enhanced education, and access medical data not readily accessible before. However, as new technologies, medications, treatments, and procedures are being developed rapidly, clinicians are expected to incorporate this new information into their daily practices, apply this knowledge to their patients, track each patient’s individual health status and background, while communicating quickly with patients, hospitals, and other providers. Additionally, clinicians are expected to keep up with the latest published medical data in the hopes of increasing the accuracy of diagnoses and treatments to improve patient health outcomes. However, there is a “small” problem with this expectation, there is not enough hours in a day to accomplish all of these tasks. According to a report by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, it would take at least 160 hours (or four 40-hour work weeks) of reading every single week just to keep up with new medical knowledge as it’s published, let alone applying the effort to consider its relevance or to implement it practically. This places false expectations on clinicians. While they may be an experienced doctor, they still require a process which delivers functional, meaningful, efficient, and user-friendly technology to their daily work environment. Therefore, it is important to develop a methodology to support and compliment the recent strategy of health care delivery and payments.
近年来,医疗保健领域的集成计算设备和系统显著增加,包括可以深入观察人体的计算机化机器,以检测以前遗漏的疾病,帮助患者参与,提供增强的教育,并访问以前不易访问的医疗数据。然而,随着新技术、药物、治疗和程序的迅速发展,临床医生被期望将这些新信息纳入他们的日常实践,将这些知识应用于他们的病人,跟踪每个病人的个人健康状况和背景,同时与病人、医院和其他提供者快速沟通。此外,临床医生应该跟上最新公布的医疗数据,希望提高诊断和治疗的准确性,以改善患者的健康结果。然而,这个期望有一个“小”问题,一天中没有足够的时间来完成所有这些任务。根据纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心(Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center)的一份报告,仅仅是为了跟上新医学知识的发布,每周至少需要160个小时(或四个40个小时的工作时间)的阅读时间,更不用说花时间去考虑它的相关性或实际应用它了。这给临床医生带来了错误的期望。虽然他们可能是一个经验丰富的医生,他们仍然需要一个过程,提供功能,有意义的,有效的,和用户友好的技术到他们的日常工作环境。因此,重要的是制定一种方法来支持和赞扬最近的保健服务提供和支付战略。