Resistance of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Blood Samples at A University Hospital: A Six-Year Evaluation Comparative to the COVID-19 Pandemic Period

C. Çelik, Meltem Özden, Hamdi Karahan, M. Hasbek, Uğur Tutar
{"title":"Resistance of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Blood Samples at A University Hospital: A Six-Year Evaluation Comparative to the COVID-19 Pandemic Period","authors":"C. Çelik, Meltem Özden, Hamdi Karahan, M. Hasbek, Uğur Tutar","doi":"10.54962/ankemderg.1166737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bloodstream infections (BSI) are among the most important nosocomial infections with high mortality and morbidity. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are two of the most common bacteria causing BSI among Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrobial resistance is one of the biggest problems in the treatment of infections caused by these bacteria. Monitoring the resistance process is important in determining the course of resistance and guiding empirical treatment. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the resistance rates of K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolated from blood samples and to present the current data in our hospital. In the study, the resistance rates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolated from blood samples in 2016-2021 against antibiotics were analyzed retrospectively by taking the data of the laboratory information system. In the study, 659 E. coli and 304 K. pneumoniae were isolated from 963 blood cultures. Of these bacteria, 34% were isolated from intensive care units and 66% from patients hospitalized in other clinics. When all antibiotics were evaluated, it was observed that resistance rates were higher in patients hospitalized in intensive care units. The most effective antibiotic was amikacin. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) positivity was 51% in intensive care unit isolates, while this rate was 36% in other clinics. Resistance rates were significantly higher in ESBL positive isolates. A significant difference was observed between pre-pandemic and pandemic periods in amikacin and meropenem resistance rates in K. pneumoniae isolates. It would be beneficial for health centers in our country to determine their own antibiotic use policies by considering scientific data. Therefore, we think that the results of this study may be a guide in determining the empirical treatment models to be applied in sepsis caused by E. coli and K. pneumoniae.","PeriodicalId":376656,"journal":{"name":"Ankem Dergisi","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ankem Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54962/ankemderg.1166737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bloodstream infections (BSI) are among the most important nosocomial infections with high mortality and morbidity. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae are two of the most common bacteria causing BSI among Gram-negative bacteria. Antimicrobial resistance is one of the biggest problems in the treatment of infections caused by these bacteria. Monitoring the resistance process is important in determining the course of resistance and guiding empirical treatment. In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the resistance rates of K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolated from blood samples and to present the current data in our hospital. In the study, the resistance rates of E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolated from blood samples in 2016-2021 against antibiotics were analyzed retrospectively by taking the data of the laboratory information system. In the study, 659 E. coli and 304 K. pneumoniae were isolated from 963 blood cultures. Of these bacteria, 34% were isolated from intensive care units and 66% from patients hospitalized in other clinics. When all antibiotics were evaluated, it was observed that resistance rates were higher in patients hospitalized in intensive care units. The most effective antibiotic was amikacin. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) positivity was 51% in intensive care unit isolates, while this rate was 36% in other clinics. Resistance rates were significantly higher in ESBL positive isolates. A significant difference was observed between pre-pandemic and pandemic periods in amikacin and meropenem resistance rates in K. pneumoniae isolates. It would be beneficial for health centers in our country to determine their own antibiotic use policies by considering scientific data. Therefore, we think that the results of this study may be a guide in determining the empirical treatment models to be applied in sepsis caused by E. coli and K. pneumoniae.
某大学医院血液中分离的大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌的耐药性:与COVID-19大流行期比较的六年评估
血流感染(BSI)是最重要的医院感染之一,具有高死亡率和发病率。大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌是革兰氏阴性菌中最常见的两种引起BSI的细菌。抗微生物药物耐药性是治疗这些细菌引起的感染的最大问题之一。监测耐药过程对确定耐药过程和指导经验性治疗具有重要意义。本研究旨在评估从血液样本中分离的肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌的耐药率,并介绍我院目前的数据。本研究通过采集实验室信息系统数据,回顾性分析2016-2021年血样分离的大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌对抗生素的耐药率。在研究中,从963例血培养中分离出659例大肠杆菌和304例肺炎克雷伯菌。在这些细菌中,34%是从重症监护病房分离出来的,66%是从其他诊所住院的患者分离出来的。当对所有抗生素进行评估时,观察到重症监护病房住院患者的耐药率较高。最有效的抗生素是阿米卡星。在重症监护病房分离株中,广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL)阳性为51%,而在其他诊所,这一比例为36%。ESBL阳性分离株的耐药率明显较高。在大流行前和大流行期间,肺炎克雷伯菌分离株的阿米卡星和美罗培南耐药率存在显著差异。我国的卫生中心在考虑科学数据的基础上确定自己的抗生素使用政策是有益的。因此,我们认为本研究结果可能对确定大肠杆菌和肺炎克雷伯菌引起的脓毒症的经验治疗模式具有指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信