{"title":"A Predictive Model for Determining Internal Rate Return (Irr) Without Trial and Error","authors":"Onuma . E. Onuma","doi":"10.9790/5933-0802036266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Planners are often confronted with challenges of evaluating proposed capital projects. The most popular tools are, inter alia 1 Net present value (NPV) 2 Benefit/ cost ratio and 3 Internal Rate of return (IRR) While the first two are straight forwardly determinable IRR on the other hand, requires a trial and error measures. Based on current literature. This is not only challenging in time consumption but presents enormous obstacle for financial advisors during brief sessions with the un-informed Business owners. The foretasted elicits is a need to develop a straight forward model to approximate IRR without the “TRIAL AND ERROR” Routine Methodology: The employment of ratio analysis and mathematical logic based on inductive reasoning determined that relationships exist among cost of capital, Benefit/cost ratio and IRR subsequently an Illustrative example on a capital project proved that the model espoused here in is useful.","PeriodicalId":387621,"journal":{"name":"IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/5933-0802036266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Planners are often confronted with challenges of evaluating proposed capital projects. The most popular tools are, inter alia 1 Net present value (NPV) 2 Benefit/ cost ratio and 3 Internal Rate of return (IRR) While the first two are straight forwardly determinable IRR on the other hand, requires a trial and error measures. Based on current literature. This is not only challenging in time consumption but presents enormous obstacle for financial advisors during brief sessions with the un-informed Business owners. The foretasted elicits is a need to develop a straight forward model to approximate IRR without the “TRIAL AND ERROR” Routine Methodology: The employment of ratio analysis and mathematical logic based on inductive reasoning determined that relationships exist among cost of capital, Benefit/cost ratio and IRR subsequently an Illustrative example on a capital project proved that the model espoused here in is useful.