{"title":"Understanding algorithm bias in artificial intelligence-enabled ERP software customization","authors":"S. Parthasarathy, S. T. Padmapriya","doi":"10.1108/jeet-04-2023-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAlgorithm bias refers to repetitive computer program errors that give some users more weight than others. The aim of this article is to provide a deeper insight of algorithm bias in AI-enabled ERP software customization. Although algorithmic bias in machine learning models has uneven, unfair and unjust impacts, research on it is mostly anecdotal and scattered.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAs guided by the previous research (Akter et al., 2022), this study presents the possible design bias (model, data and method) one may experience with enterprise resource planning (ERP) software customization algorithm. This study then presents the artificial intelligence (AI) version of ERP customization algorithm using k-nearest neighbours algorithm.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study illustrates the possible bias when the prioritized requirements customization estimation (PRCE) algorithm available in the ERP literature is executed without any AI. Then, the authors present their newly developed AI version of the PRCE algorithm that uses ML techniques. The authors then discuss its adjoining algorithmic bias with an illustration. Further, the authors also draw a roadmap for managing algorithmic bias during ERP customization in practice.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, no prior research has attempted to understand the algorithmic bias that occurs during the execution of the ERP customization algorithm (with or without AI).\n","PeriodicalId":229407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethics in Entrepreneurship and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jeet-04-2023-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Algorithm bias refers to repetitive computer program errors that give some users more weight than others. The aim of this article is to provide a deeper insight of algorithm bias in AI-enabled ERP software customization. Although algorithmic bias in machine learning models has uneven, unfair and unjust impacts, research on it is mostly anecdotal and scattered.
Design/methodology/approach
As guided by the previous research (Akter et al., 2022), this study presents the possible design bias (model, data and method) one may experience with enterprise resource planning (ERP) software customization algorithm. This study then presents the artificial intelligence (AI) version of ERP customization algorithm using k-nearest neighbours algorithm.
Findings
This study illustrates the possible bias when the prioritized requirements customization estimation (PRCE) algorithm available in the ERP literature is executed without any AI. Then, the authors present their newly developed AI version of the PRCE algorithm that uses ML techniques. The authors then discuss its adjoining algorithmic bias with an illustration. Further, the authors also draw a roadmap for managing algorithmic bias during ERP customization in practice.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, no prior research has attempted to understand the algorithmic bias that occurs during the execution of the ERP customization algorithm (with or without AI).
算法偏差指的是重复的计算机程序错误,赋予某些用户比其他用户更多的权重。本文的目的是提供对人工智能支持的ERP软件定制中的算法偏差的更深入的了解。尽管机器学习模型中的算法偏差具有不均衡、不公平和不公正的影响,但对它的研究大多是零散的。在先前研究(Akter et al., 2022)的指导下,本研究提出了在企业资源规划(ERP)软件定制算法中可能遇到的设计偏差(模型、数据和方法)。然后,本研究提出了人工智能(AI)版本的ERP定制算法使用k-最近邻算法。本研究说明了当ERP文献中可用的优先需求定制估计(PRCE)算法在没有任何人工智能的情况下执行时可能存在的偏差。然后,作者介绍了他们新开发的使用ML技术的PRCE算法的AI版本。然后,作者用一个例子讨论了其相邻的算法偏差。此外,作者还绘制了在ERP定制过程中管理算法偏差的路线图。原创性/价值据作者所知,之前没有研究试图理解在ERP定制算法执行过程中发生的算法偏差(有或没有人工智能)。