Analgesia For Dressing Changes In Burns: A Systematic Review

M. Ramadan, A. Wardhana, A. Sugiarto
{"title":"Analgesia For Dressing Changes In Burns: A Systematic Review","authors":"M. Ramadan, A. Wardhana, A. Sugiarto","doi":"10.14228/JPR.V5I1.249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n \nBackground: Intense and prolonged pain often caused by burn injuries. The greatest pain is mostly experienced during dressing changes to maintain healing and banish the infection. This review is conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of different analgesia agents or methods for dressing changes in burn patients. \nMethod: Searches of studies conducted from 4 electronic databases, using keywords “Analgesia”, “Dressing”, “Bandages”, “Changes” and “Burns”. We included randomized and quasi-randomized trials assessing and comparing the effects of different analgesia agents, analgesia methods for dressing changes in burns patients. We excluded trials reporting only pharmacokinetic and physiological outcomes, comparing drug dosages, with exception for those using different drugs in the same class. \nResult: Multiple databases search retrieved 144 studies. 17 trials are eligible involving 700 patients. Analgesia using pharmacological agents in 7 trials; 5 trials elaborating primary treatments and 2 trials as the adjunct treatment complementing the major analgesia. Two primary analgesia treatments were studying the role of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), while 3 trials using caregiver delivered. Ten trials were observing the role of non-pharmacological analgesia. \nConclusion: There was inadequate evidence from comparisons tested in randomized trials to confirm the dependent effectiveness of various techniques of analgesia, individual methods, or to assess the administration of different drug adjuncts for providing analgesia during dressing changes. Given the unresolved questions about the management of these conditions, we suggest that preference should be focused on the large scale, optionally, multi-center randomized observations of the primary methods. \n \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":364477,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Plastik Rekonstruksi","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Plastik Rekonstruksi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14228/JPR.V5I1.249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Intense and prolonged pain often caused by burn injuries. The greatest pain is mostly experienced during dressing changes to maintain healing and banish the infection. This review is conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of different analgesia agents or methods for dressing changes in burn patients. Method: Searches of studies conducted from 4 electronic databases, using keywords “Analgesia”, “Dressing”, “Bandages”, “Changes” and “Burns”. We included randomized and quasi-randomized trials assessing and comparing the effects of different analgesia agents, analgesia methods for dressing changes in burns patients. We excluded trials reporting only pharmacokinetic and physiological outcomes, comparing drug dosages, with exception for those using different drugs in the same class. Result: Multiple databases search retrieved 144 studies. 17 trials are eligible involving 700 patients. Analgesia using pharmacological agents in 7 trials; 5 trials elaborating primary treatments and 2 trials as the adjunct treatment complementing the major analgesia. Two primary analgesia treatments were studying the role of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), while 3 trials using caregiver delivered. Ten trials were observing the role of non-pharmacological analgesia. Conclusion: There was inadequate evidence from comparisons tested in randomized trials to confirm the dependent effectiveness of various techniques of analgesia, individual methods, or to assess the administration of different drug adjuncts for providing analgesia during dressing changes. Given the unresolved questions about the management of these conditions, we suggest that preference should be focused on the large scale, optionally, multi-center randomized observations of the primary methods.
烧伤换药镇痛:系统综述
背景:强烈和持久的疼痛通常由烧伤引起。最大的疼痛大多发生在换药以保持愈合和消除感染的过程中。本综述旨在评估不同镇痛药物或方法对烧伤患者换药的有效性和安全性。方法:以“镇痛”、“敷料”、“绷带”、“变化”、“烧伤”为关键词,从4个电子数据库中检索相关研究。我们纳入随机和准随机试验,评估和比较不同镇痛药物、镇痛方法对烧伤患者换药的影响。我们排除了仅报告药代动力学和生理结果、比较药物剂量的试验,但使用同一类别不同药物的试验除外。结果:多个数据库检索到144项研究。17项试验符合条件,涉及700名患者。7项试验采用药物镇痛;5项试验阐述了主要的治疗方法,2项试验作为主要镇痛的辅助治疗方法。两项主要镇痛治疗是研究患者自控镇痛(PCA)的作用,而3项试验是使用护理人员提供的。10项试验观察非药物镇痛的作用。结论:在随机试验中进行的比较没有足够的证据来证实各种镇痛技术、个体方法的依赖有效性,或评估不同药物辅助治疗在换药期间提供镇痛的作用。鉴于这些疾病的管理尚未解决的问题,我们建议优先关注主要方法的大规模,可选的,多中心随机观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信