A Field-Scale Real-Time Prediction of Reservoir Porosity from Advanced Mud Gas Data

F. Anifowose, M. Mezghani, Saleh Badawood, Javed Ismail
{"title":"A Field-Scale Real-Time Prediction of Reservoir Porosity from Advanced Mud Gas Data","authors":"F. Anifowose, M. Mezghani, Saleh Badawood, Javed Ismail","doi":"10.2118/214398-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In our previous study, we presented the preliminary results of the first attempt to predict reservoir rock porosity from advanced mud gas (AMG) data within the wellbore. The objective was to investigate the feasibility of generating a porosity log while drilling prior to wireline logging and core description processes. Knowing that porosity remains a critical property of petroleum reservoirs, this work improves on the previous research to predict porosity within a field.\n The methodology leveraged the machine learning (ML) paradigm in the absence of established physical relationship between AMG data, comprising light and heavy flare gas components, and reservoir rock porosity. More than 15,000 data points collected from representative wells in a field were used to prove the possibility of predicting the missing porosity in a well within the field. Optimized models of artificial neural network (ANN), decision trees (DT) and random forest (RF) were applied to the combined dataset. The dataset was randomly split into training and validation subsets in 70:30 ratio simulating the complete and missing sections respectively.\n Comparing the results of the ANN, DT, and RF models using statistical model performance evaluation metrics, the RF model consistently outperformed the others. In one of the test cases, the RF model gave a correlation coefficient (R-Squared) value of 0.84 compared to 0.46, and 0.78 for ANN and DT models respectively. The RF model also has a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.001 compared to 0.02 and 0.01 respectively for ANN and DT models. Having showed in a previous publication that a multivariate linear regression model could not handle the complexity in the relationship between porosity and the flare gas components, these results have further confirmed the robustness of nonlinear solutions based on the ML methodology. It can be deduced that the ML approach to predicting reservoir rock porosity from advanced mud gas data is feasible and better results are achievable with more research.\n This study has confirmed the feasibility of predicting porosity at the field scale and the huge benefit in utilizing AMG data beyond the traditional fluid typing and petrophysical correlation processes. The presented approach has the capability to complement existing reservoir characterization processes in assessing reservoir quality at the early stage of exploration. Future work will investigate the impact of integrating the AMG with surface drilling parameters to possibly increase the prediction accuracy.","PeriodicalId":306106,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, June 08, 2023","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, June 08, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/214398-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In our previous study, we presented the preliminary results of the first attempt to predict reservoir rock porosity from advanced mud gas (AMG) data within the wellbore. The objective was to investigate the feasibility of generating a porosity log while drilling prior to wireline logging and core description processes. Knowing that porosity remains a critical property of petroleum reservoirs, this work improves on the previous research to predict porosity within a field. The methodology leveraged the machine learning (ML) paradigm in the absence of established physical relationship between AMG data, comprising light and heavy flare gas components, and reservoir rock porosity. More than 15,000 data points collected from representative wells in a field were used to prove the possibility of predicting the missing porosity in a well within the field. Optimized models of artificial neural network (ANN), decision trees (DT) and random forest (RF) were applied to the combined dataset. The dataset was randomly split into training and validation subsets in 70:30 ratio simulating the complete and missing sections respectively. Comparing the results of the ANN, DT, and RF models using statistical model performance evaluation metrics, the RF model consistently outperformed the others. In one of the test cases, the RF model gave a correlation coefficient (R-Squared) value of 0.84 compared to 0.46, and 0.78 for ANN and DT models respectively. The RF model also has a mean squared error (MSE) of 0.001 compared to 0.02 and 0.01 respectively for ANN and DT models. Having showed in a previous publication that a multivariate linear regression model could not handle the complexity in the relationship between porosity and the flare gas components, these results have further confirmed the robustness of nonlinear solutions based on the ML methodology. It can be deduced that the ML approach to predicting reservoir rock porosity from advanced mud gas data is feasible and better results are achievable with more research. This study has confirmed the feasibility of predicting porosity at the field scale and the huge benefit in utilizing AMG data beyond the traditional fluid typing and petrophysical correlation processes. The presented approach has the capability to complement existing reservoir characterization processes in assessing reservoir quality at the early stage of exploration. Future work will investigate the impact of integrating the AMG with surface drilling parameters to possibly increase the prediction accuracy.
利用先进的泥浆气数据实时预测储层孔隙度
在之前的研究中,我们首次尝试通过井筒内的高级泥浆气(AMG)数据预测储层岩石孔隙度,并给出了初步结果。目的是研究在电缆测井和岩心描述过程之前,在钻井过程中生成孔隙度测井的可行性。考虑到孔隙度仍然是油藏的一项重要属性,本研究改进了以往预测油田孔隙度的研究。在AMG数据(包括轻质和重质火炬气成分)与储层岩石孔隙度之间没有建立物理关系的情况下,该方法利用了机器学习(ML)范式。从某油田的代表性井中收集的15,000多个数据点被用来证明预测油田内井中缺失孔隙度的可能性。将人工神经网络(ANN)、决策树(DT)和随机森林(RF)的优化模型应用于组合数据集。数据集按70:30的比例随机分成训练子集和验证子集,分别模拟完整和缺失部分。使用统计模型性能评估指标比较ANN、DT和RF模型的结果,RF模型始终优于其他模型。在其中一个测试用例中,RF模型的相关系数(R-Squared)为0.84,而ANN和DT模型的相关系数分别为0.46和0.78。RF模型的均方误差(MSE)为0.001,而ANN和DT模型的均方误差分别为0.02和0.01。在先前的出版物中表明,多元线性回归模型无法处理孔隙度与火炬气组分之间关系的复杂性,这些结果进一步证实了基于ML方法的非线性解的鲁棒性。由此可以推断,利用先进的泥浆气资料进行储层孔隙度预测的ML方法是可行的,并且随着研究的深入,可以获得更好的结果。该研究证实了在油田规模上预测孔隙度的可行性,以及利用AMG数据超越传统的流体分型和岩石物理对比过程的巨大优势。所提出的方法有能力补充现有的储层表征过程,在勘探的早期阶段评估储层质量。未来的工作将研究将AMG与地面钻井参数相结合的影响,以可能提高预测精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信