AIVA vs UML: Comparison of Component Application Visualizations in a Case-study

J. Snajberk, Lukas Holy, Přemek Brada
{"title":"AIVA vs UML: Comparison of Component Application Visualizations in a Case-study","authors":"J. Snajberk, Lukas Holy, Přemek Brada","doi":"10.1109/IV.2012.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"UML is the state of the art in visualization of software. However, it does not satisfy the needs of modeling in the domain of component applications and complex software architectures. UML has to be extended with profiles so as to be able to model the specifics of a particular component model; its diagrams are not scalable, therefore one has to balance the amount of information and readability; and it presents all the information at once so visual data mining is harder. These were the reasons for developing a completely new approach called AIVA (Advanced Interactive Visualization Approach) that focuses solely on the component domain and addresses the problems of scalability and readability by adopting interactive techniques like information hiding and details on demand. In this paper we analyse how this new approach stands compared with UML by modelling a nontrivial component application.","PeriodicalId":264951,"journal":{"name":"2012 16th International Conference on Information Visualisation","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 16th International Conference on Information Visualisation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IV.2012.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

UML is the state of the art in visualization of software. However, it does not satisfy the needs of modeling in the domain of component applications and complex software architectures. UML has to be extended with profiles so as to be able to model the specifics of a particular component model; its diagrams are not scalable, therefore one has to balance the amount of information and readability; and it presents all the information at once so visual data mining is harder. These were the reasons for developing a completely new approach called AIVA (Advanced Interactive Visualization Approach) that focuses solely on the component domain and addresses the problems of scalability and readability by adopting interactive techniques like information hiding and details on demand. In this paper we analyse how this new approach stands compared with UML by modelling a nontrivial component application.
AIVA与UML:案例研究中组件应用程序可视化的比较
UML是软件可视化的最新技术。然而,它不能满足组件应用和复杂软件体系结构领域的建模需求。UML必须使用概要文件进行扩展,以便能够对特定组件模型的细节进行建模;它的图表是不可伸缩的,因此你必须平衡信息量和可读性;而且它同时显示所有的信息,因此可视化数据挖掘比较困难。这就是开发一种称为AIVA(高级交互式可视化方法)的全新方法的原因,该方法只关注组件领域,并通过采用信息隐藏和按需详细信息等交互式技术来解决可伸缩性和可读性问题。在本文中,我们通过建模一个重要的组件应用程序来分析这种新方法与UML的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信