Tinkering in the Wild: What Leads to Success for Female End-User Programmers?

L. Lyon, C. Clayton, Emilv Green
{"title":"Tinkering in the Wild: What Leads to Success for Female End-User Programmers?","authors":"L. Lyon, C. Clayton, Emilv Green","doi":"10.1109/VLHCC.2018.8506561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tinkering has been found to be beneficial to learning, yet women report being disinclined to tinker with software even though their tinkering can be more effective than men's. This paper reports on a real-world study of how female end-user programmers tinker with new and existing code and what makes their tinkering successful. Findings show that tinkering falls into two main categories: testing an educated guess (more successful) or haphazard trial and error (less successful). In addition, learners occasionally do not tinker to test a successful solution but rather wait to ask another for confirmation of their educated guess before proceeding. Conclusions from this work show that tinkering leads to success when participants are thinking critically about what the code is doing and have hypothesized expected results from code changes. These findings suggest that designers of end-user programmer instructional materials would assist learners by giving explicit tools and techniques that foster successful tinkering.","PeriodicalId":444336,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)","volume":"61 26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VLHCC.2018.8506561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Tinkering has been found to be beneficial to learning, yet women report being disinclined to tinker with software even though their tinkering can be more effective than men's. This paper reports on a real-world study of how female end-user programmers tinker with new and existing code and what makes their tinkering successful. Findings show that tinkering falls into two main categories: testing an educated guess (more successful) or haphazard trial and error (less successful). In addition, learners occasionally do not tinker to test a successful solution but rather wait to ask another for confirmation of their educated guess before proceeding. Conclusions from this work show that tinkering leads to success when participants are thinking critically about what the code is doing and have hypothesized expected results from code changes. These findings suggest that designers of end-user programmer instructional materials would assist learners by giving explicit tools and techniques that foster successful tinkering.
野外修修补补:女性终端用户程序员的成功秘诀是什么?
修修补补已被发现对学习有益,然而女性报告称她们不愿意修修软件,尽管她们的修修补补可能比男性更有效。本文报告了一项现实世界的研究,研究女性最终用户程序员如何修补新的和现有的代码,以及是什么使她们的修补成功。研究结果表明,修修补补主要分为两类:测试有根据的猜测(更成功)或随意的尝试和错误(不太成功)。此外,学习者有时不会为了测试一个成功的解决方案而进行修修补补,而是在继续之前等待另一个人来确认他们的猜测。这项工作的结论表明,当参与者批判性地思考代码正在做什么,并对代码更改的预期结果进行假设时,修修补补会导致成功。这些发现表明,最终用户程序员教学材料的设计者应该通过提供明确的工具和技术来帮助学习者成功地进行修补。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信