Tactics for Collaboration Across and Within Disciplines

In Commons Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.35483/acsa.am.111.44
Mary E. Hale
{"title":"Tactics for Collaboration Across and Within Disciplines","authors":"Mary E. Hale","doi":"10.35483/acsa.am.111.44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the architectural design process may be led by a figurehead architect, contemporary buildings are the result of vast teams of designers, engineers, and builders. They are furthermore influenced by social issues, local policy, and clients. Yet typical American architectural design pedagogy centers around design studios where students work individually on creative projects. This pedagogical style reinforces a fallacy of the genius architect, the heroic designer who designs and creates in a vacuum. This paper and presentation showcases a seminar designed specifically to subvert this paradigm and provide targeted collaboration skills and support to students as they work on inter- and intra-disciplinary teams on a creative project. Taught collaboratively between Northeastern University’s School of Architecture and New York University’s Tisch School of Dance, this course takes inspiration from historical collaborations between prominent experimental dancers and designers like Anna and Lawrence Halprin; Merce Cunningham, John Cage and a variety of designers; and others. During the first six weeks of the semester, architects and dancers prepare within their own disciplinary cohorts for collaboration. Architects learn from case studies in contemporary dance and set design; they learn hand drawing and sketching skills for quick ways of expressing their ideas; and finally they read, complete exercises from and discuss Collaborative Intelligence: Thinking with People Who Think Differently, by Dawna Markova and Angie McArthur. Dancers also read this book. Following this preparatory period, architecture students are paired based on skill areas, interests and working styles discovered through the workshop. Then, architect pairs and dancers exchange portfolios of work before meeting remotely for a “speed-dating” style zoom session after which they rank their preferred collaborators. Teams are thus formed and the long distance collaboration between architect pairs and dancers begins. Together, architect-dancer teams envision and prototype a public performance through remote collaboration. Students draw from the methods in Collaborative Intelligence to address conflicts. Through this process, architecture students experience at a small but real scale the architectural design and delivery process from conceptual development to project completion with a focus on building collaboration tactics.","PeriodicalId":243862,"journal":{"name":"In Commons","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"In Commons","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35483/acsa.am.111.44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the architectural design process may be led by a figurehead architect, contemporary buildings are the result of vast teams of designers, engineers, and builders. They are furthermore influenced by social issues, local policy, and clients. Yet typical American architectural design pedagogy centers around design studios where students work individually on creative projects. This pedagogical style reinforces a fallacy of the genius architect, the heroic designer who designs and creates in a vacuum. This paper and presentation showcases a seminar designed specifically to subvert this paradigm and provide targeted collaboration skills and support to students as they work on inter- and intra-disciplinary teams on a creative project. Taught collaboratively between Northeastern University’s School of Architecture and New York University’s Tisch School of Dance, this course takes inspiration from historical collaborations between prominent experimental dancers and designers like Anna and Lawrence Halprin; Merce Cunningham, John Cage and a variety of designers; and others. During the first six weeks of the semester, architects and dancers prepare within their own disciplinary cohorts for collaboration. Architects learn from case studies in contemporary dance and set design; they learn hand drawing and sketching skills for quick ways of expressing their ideas; and finally they read, complete exercises from and discuss Collaborative Intelligence: Thinking with People Who Think Differently, by Dawna Markova and Angie McArthur. Dancers also read this book. Following this preparatory period, architecture students are paired based on skill areas, interests and working styles discovered through the workshop. Then, architect pairs and dancers exchange portfolios of work before meeting remotely for a “speed-dating” style zoom session after which they rank their preferred collaborators. Teams are thus formed and the long distance collaboration between architect pairs and dancers begins. Together, architect-dancer teams envision and prototype a public performance through remote collaboration. Students draw from the methods in Collaborative Intelligence to address conflicts. Through this process, architecture students experience at a small but real scale the architectural design and delivery process from conceptual development to project completion with a focus on building collaboration tactics.
跨学科和学科内部合作的策略
虽然建筑设计过程可能由一个名义上的建筑师领导,但当代建筑是设计师、工程师和建造者组成的庞大团队的结果。此外,他们还受到社会问题、当地政策和客户的影响。然而,典型的美国建筑设计教学以设计工作室为中心,学生们在那里独立完成创意项目。这种教学风格强化了天才建筑师的谬论,即在真空中设计和创造的英雄设计师。这篇论文和演示展示了一个专门为颠覆这种范式而设计的研讨会,并为学生提供有针对性的协作技能和支持,因为他们在跨学科和跨学科的团队中从事创造性项目。这门课程由东北大学建筑学院和纽约大学蒂施舞蹈学院合作教授,灵感来自安娜和劳伦斯·哈尔普林等著名实验舞者和设计师之间的历史合作;Merce Cunningham, John Cage和其他设计师;和其他人。在本学期的前六周,建筑师和舞者在各自的学科群体中为合作做准备。建筑师从当代舞蹈和布景设计的案例研究中学习;他们学习手绘和素描技巧,以快速表达自己的想法;最后,他们阅读、完成练习,并讨论道娜·马科娃和安吉·麦克阿瑟所著的《协作智能:与思维不同的人一起思考》。舞蹈演员也读这本书。在这个准备阶段之后,建筑专业的学生将根据技能领域、兴趣和工作方式进行配对。然后,建筑师和舞者交换作品组合,然后远程会面,进行“速配”式的变焦会议,之后他们对自己喜欢的合作者进行排名。团队就这样形成了,建筑师和舞者之间的远距离合作开始了。建筑师和舞蹈家团队通过远程协作,共同构思和制作公共表演的原型。学生借鉴协作智能中的方法来解决冲突。通过这个过程,建筑专业的学生以一个小而真实的规模体验建筑设计和交付过程,从概念开发到项目完成,重点是建筑协作策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信