Decreasing Patient Radiation Exposure from Computed Tomography for Hip Preservation Surgery

J. Marland, Jason J. Smythe, Daniel Barlow, Daniel Whiting, Brayden Payne, Hugh S. West, J. Wylie
{"title":"Decreasing Patient Radiation Exposure from Computed Tomography for Hip Preservation Surgery","authors":"J. Marland, Jason J. Smythe, Daniel Barlow, Daniel Whiting, Brayden Payne, Hugh S. West, J. Wylie","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1769086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article describes how we were able to decrease patient radiation exposure from hip computed tomography (CT) for hip preservation evaluation without a degradation of image quality. This is a retrospective review of a quality improvement project. The study included patients who underwent hip CT at a single center as part of a clinical evaluation for young adult hip pain. Four distinct protocols were used during the study period. All protocols included at CT scan of the hip with slices through the distal femur to evaluate femoral version. Patient variables collected included age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). The dose–length product was collected and the effective dose in millisieverts (mSv) was calculated. Differences in dose between protocols were compared using analysis of variance with appropriate post hoc tests and multivariate general linear regression. A total of 613 patients underwent hip CT during the study period with 304 patients in protocol 1, 83 in protocol 2, 136 in protocol 3, and 91 in protocol 4. When controlling for age, gender, and BMI there was a significant decrease in effective dose of radiation from protocol 1 (3.63 mSv) to protocol 2 (3.06 mSv) ( p  = 0.002) and protocol 2 (3.06 mSv) to protocol 3 (2.16 mSv) ( p  < 0.001). There was no difference between protocol 3 (2.16 mSv) and protocol 4 (2.10 mSv) ( p  = 0.269) but protocol 4 was easier to administer. In regression modeling, BMI ( p  < 0.001) and protocol used ( p  < 0.001) were independent predictors of effective radiation dose (model R 2  = 0.585). Through a longitudinal clinical quality improvement project, we were able to decrease the effective radiation exposure to patients undergoing hip CT for hip preservation evaluation by close to 50%. Only CT protocol used and patient's BMI were predictors of ionizing radiation exposure. Level of Evidence  Level 3, retrospective comparative study.","PeriodicalId":427844,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Hip Surgery","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Hip Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1769086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article describes how we were able to decrease patient radiation exposure from hip computed tomography (CT) for hip preservation evaluation without a degradation of image quality. This is a retrospective review of a quality improvement project. The study included patients who underwent hip CT at a single center as part of a clinical evaluation for young adult hip pain. Four distinct protocols were used during the study period. All protocols included at CT scan of the hip with slices through the distal femur to evaluate femoral version. Patient variables collected included age, gender, and body mass index (BMI). The dose–length product was collected and the effective dose in millisieverts (mSv) was calculated. Differences in dose between protocols were compared using analysis of variance with appropriate post hoc tests and multivariate general linear regression. A total of 613 patients underwent hip CT during the study period with 304 patients in protocol 1, 83 in protocol 2, 136 in protocol 3, and 91 in protocol 4. When controlling for age, gender, and BMI there was a significant decrease in effective dose of radiation from protocol 1 (3.63 mSv) to protocol 2 (3.06 mSv) ( p  = 0.002) and protocol 2 (3.06 mSv) to protocol 3 (2.16 mSv) ( p  < 0.001). There was no difference between protocol 3 (2.16 mSv) and protocol 4 (2.10 mSv) ( p  = 0.269) but protocol 4 was easier to administer. In regression modeling, BMI ( p  < 0.001) and protocol used ( p  < 0.001) were independent predictors of effective radiation dose (model R 2  = 0.585). Through a longitudinal clinical quality improvement project, we were able to decrease the effective radiation exposure to patients undergoing hip CT for hip preservation evaluation by close to 50%. Only CT protocol used and patient's BMI were predictors of ionizing radiation exposure. Level of Evidence  Level 3, retrospective comparative study.
降低髋部保存手术中计算机断层扫描患者的辐射暴露
摘要:本文描述了我们如何能够在不降低图像质量的情况下减少髋关节计算机断层扫描(CT)对髋关节保存评估的患者辐射暴露。这是对质量改进项目的回顾性审查。该研究包括在单一中心接受髋关节CT的患者,作为年轻成人髋关节疼痛临床评估的一部分。在研究期间使用了四种不同的方案。所有方案均包括髋关节CT扫描,通过股骨远端切片来评估股骨版本。收集的患者变量包括年龄、性别和体重指数(BMI)。收集剂量-长度乘积,计算有效剂量(毫西弗)。采用方差分析、适当的事后检验和多变量一般线性回归比较不同方案之间的剂量差异。在研究期间,共有613例患者接受了髋关节CT,其中方案1 304例,方案2 83例,方案3 136例,方案4 91例。在控制年龄、性别和BMI的情况下,有效辐射剂量从方案1 (3.63 mSv)显著降低到方案2 (3.06 mSv) (p = 0.002),从方案2 (3.06 mSv)显著降低到方案3 (2.16 mSv) (p < 0.001)。方案3 (2.16 mSv)和方案4 (2.10 mSv)之间没有差异(p = 0.269),但方案4更容易管理。在回归模型中,BMI (p < 0.001)和使用的方案(p < 0.001)是有效辐射剂量的独立预测因子(模型r2 = 0.585)。通过纵向临床质量改善项目,我们能够将接受髋关节CT进行髋关节保存评估的患者的有效辐射暴露减少近50%。仅使用CT方案和患者的BMI是电离辐射暴露的预测因子。证据等级3级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信