M. Clark
{"title":"South German Anabaptist Ecclesiology and Its Present-day Pentecostal Counterpart","authors":"M. Clark","doi":"10.31380/2573-6345.1108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Th is article accepts that twentieth-century classical Pentecostalism originally shared a similar ethos to that exemplifi ed among the South German Anabaptists, and investigates some resonances in ecclesiology between the two. Scrutiny of a selection of early sixteenth-century documents relating to Anabaptism identifi es the following: a radically consistent application of sola scriptura, a rejection of the state-church synthesis, a revisioning of sacramental belief and practice that subverts the clergy-laity divide, commitment to the teachings of Jesus as the primary and central guide to discipleship, a sacrifi cial pilgrim mentality of “just passing through this world,” individual choice and responsibility to follow Jesus, confi dent personal witness to the goodness and salvation of the Lord, and some level of demonstration of the charismatic gifts. Early Pentecostalism resonated with all these themes, although it developed a more detailed and sophisticated biblical and theological understanding of the charismatic aspects. However, present-day popular Pentecostalism, especially but not exclusively in the West, appears to demonstrate in its implied ecclesiology a number of dissonances from all of these elements, which may indicate a signifi cant divergence from the original ethos of the movement and present major future challenges to its authentic and consistent continuation and self-propagation. Spiritus 4.1 (2019) 99–129 htt p://digitalshowcase.oru.edu/spiritus/ © The Author(s) 2019 Reprints and Permissions: Spiritus@oru.edu","PeriodicalId":186131,"journal":{"name":"Spiritus: ORU Journal of Theology","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spiritus: ORU Journal of Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31380/2573-6345.1108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
德国南部再洗礼派教会学及其现今的五旬节派
这篇文章承认,二十世纪的古典五旬节派最初与德国南部的再洗礼派有着相似的精神,并研究了两者在教会学上的一些共鸣。仔细阅读16世纪早期与再洗礼有关的文献,可以发现以下几点:“唯独圣经”(sola scriptura)的彻底一致的应用,对国家与教会合一的拒绝,对圣礼信仰和实践的修正,颠覆了神职人员与世俗之间的鸿沟,将耶稣的教义作为门徒训练的主要和中心指南,一种“只是经过这个世界”的牺牲朝圣者心态,跟随耶稣的个人选择和责任,对主的良善和救恩有信心的个人见证,以及某种程度上对灵恩恩赐的展示。早期的五旬节派与所有这些主题都产生了共鸣,尽管它对灵恩方面有了更详细、更复杂的圣经和神学理解。然而,当今流行的五旬节派,特别是但不只是在西方,似乎在其隐含的教会学中表现出与所有这些元素的一些不和谐,这可能表明与该运动最初的精神有重大分歧,并对其真实和一致的延续和自我传播提出了重大挑战。Spiritus 4.1 (2019) 99-129 html://digitalshowcase.oru.edu/spiritus/©作者2019转载及权限:Spiritus@oru.edu
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。