A Policy Agenda for Legal Education and Training and the Fourth Industrial Revolution: The Case of England and Wales

Andra le Roux-Kemp
{"title":"A Policy Agenda for Legal Education and Training and the Fourth Industrial Revolution: The Case of England and Wales","authors":"Andra le Roux-Kemp","doi":"10.19164/jltt.v2i1.1004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the full impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution remains uncertain, it is by now generally accepted that highly intelligent technologies and their applications – such as robotics, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, digitialisation, and big Data – will continue to fundamentally transform all aspects of our occupational and personal lives. Yet, in the realm of higher education policy and specifically with regard to non-STEM disciplines like law, thorough-going engagement with this most recent wave of technological development remains lacking. It is the aim of this article to set a policy agenda for legal education and training that is sensitive to the opportunities and potential negative outfall of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (now exacerbated by COVID-19), while also taking into consideration the distinctive nature of legal education and training in England and Wales. Set against the higher education policy landscape of England and Wales, a number of concrete recommendations are made for bringing legal education and training into the age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. These include, for example, a call for the radical transformation of the traditional, linear, and monodisciplinary LLB degree, addressing current and projected skills gaps and skills shortages by way of, inter alia, curriculum reform, and working towards greater mobility of law graduates between different legal jurisdictions and also within one jurisdiction but amongst different roles. These changes are necessary as legal education and training in England and Wales currently leave law graduates ill-equipped for the future labour market and do not adequately value and build on the job-tasks that legal professionals uniquely supply.","PeriodicalId":140361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law, Technology and Trust","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law, Technology and Trust","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19164/jltt.v2i1.1004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While the full impact of the Fourth Industrial Revolution remains uncertain, it is by now generally accepted that highly intelligent technologies and their applications – such as robotics, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, digitialisation, and big Data – will continue to fundamentally transform all aspects of our occupational and personal lives. Yet, in the realm of higher education policy and specifically with regard to non-STEM disciplines like law, thorough-going engagement with this most recent wave of technological development remains lacking. It is the aim of this article to set a policy agenda for legal education and training that is sensitive to the opportunities and potential negative outfall of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (now exacerbated by COVID-19), while also taking into consideration the distinctive nature of legal education and training in England and Wales. Set against the higher education policy landscape of England and Wales, a number of concrete recommendations are made for bringing legal education and training into the age of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. These include, for example, a call for the radical transformation of the traditional, linear, and monodisciplinary LLB degree, addressing current and projected skills gaps and skills shortages by way of, inter alia, curriculum reform, and working towards greater mobility of law graduates between different legal jurisdictions and also within one jurisdiction but amongst different roles. These changes are necessary as legal education and training in England and Wales currently leave law graduates ill-equipped for the future labour market and do not adequately value and build on the job-tasks that legal professionals uniquely supply.
法律教育和培训与第四次工业革命的政策议程:英格兰和威尔士的案例
虽然第四次工业革命的全面影响仍不确定,但目前人们普遍认为,高度智能的技术及其应用——如机器人、人工智能(AI)、机器学习、数字化和大数据——将继续从根本上改变我们职业和个人生活的各个方面。然而,在高等教育政策领域,特别是在法律等非stem学科方面,仍然缺乏对这一最新技术发展浪潮的全面参与。本文的目的是为法律教育和培训制定一个政策议程,该议程对第四次工业革命(现在因COVID-19而加剧)的机会和潜在负面影响敏感,同时也考虑到英格兰和威尔士法律教育和培训的独特性质。针对英格兰和威尔士的高等教育政策格局,提出了一些具体建议,以使法律教育和培训进入第四次工业革命时代。例如,呼吁彻底改变传统的、线性的、单一学科的法学学士学位,通过课程改革等方式解决当前和预计的技能差距和技能短缺问题,并努力使法律毕业生在不同的司法管辖区之间以及在一个司法管辖区内但在不同角色之间有更大的流动性。这些变化是必要的,因为英格兰和威尔士的法律教育和培训目前使法律毕业生对未来的劳动力市场准备不足,并且没有充分重视和建立法律专业人员独特提供的工作任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信