Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Attending a Victorian Metropolitan Crisis Intervention Team

M. Rao, K. Jagadheesan, Partha Das, V. Lakra
{"title":"Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Patients Attending a Victorian Metropolitan Crisis Intervention Team","authors":"M. Rao, K. Jagadheesan, Partha Das, V. Lakra","doi":"10.4103/WSP.WSP_66_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Little is known about the nature of service users who seek crisis community care in recent times in the Australian context. Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe the sociodemographic, clinical, and service provision characteristics and 12-month clinical outcomes of patients in a metropolitan crisis intervention team. Methods: Patients who were registered during the study period (May 1, 2015–October 30, 2015) for crisis intervention from a metropolitan community mental health team were included for this retrospective cohort study. The type of psychosocial stressor triggering the crisis was assessed by the social readjustment scale. Results: A situational crisis or adjustment disorder (26.6%) was the most common primary diagnosis, followed by an affective disorder. Deliberate self-harm behavior was the leading risk behavior (18.1%). Major injury or illness to self (16%) was the main psychosocial stressor associated with crisis presentation. The primary health sector was the main source of referral and discharge destination. Nearly 40% of patients were re-referred within a 12-month period since index contact. The characteristics of re-referred patients were men, living with a housemate or other family, triage category C, diagnosis of a mood disorder, needing medication supervision, and discharged to inpatient treatment during the index episode of care. Conclusions: A continuous and collaborative model of care between the primary health sector and community mental health services might be more beneficial in the early identification and management of the acute crisis in a subgroup of patients. A diverse range of skills are needed for clinicians working in the crisis intervention service in the current times.","PeriodicalId":285109,"journal":{"name":"World Social Psychiatry","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Social Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/WSP.WSP_66_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Little is known about the nature of service users who seek crisis community care in recent times in the Australian context. Objectives: The objective of this study was to describe the sociodemographic, clinical, and service provision characteristics and 12-month clinical outcomes of patients in a metropolitan crisis intervention team. Methods: Patients who were registered during the study period (May 1, 2015–October 30, 2015) for crisis intervention from a metropolitan community mental health team were included for this retrospective cohort study. The type of psychosocial stressor triggering the crisis was assessed by the social readjustment scale. Results: A situational crisis or adjustment disorder (26.6%) was the most common primary diagnosis, followed by an affective disorder. Deliberate self-harm behavior was the leading risk behavior (18.1%). Major injury or illness to self (16%) was the main psychosocial stressor associated with crisis presentation. The primary health sector was the main source of referral and discharge destination. Nearly 40% of patients were re-referred within a 12-month period since index contact. The characteristics of re-referred patients were men, living with a housemate or other family, triage category C, diagnosis of a mood disorder, needing medication supervision, and discharged to inpatient treatment during the index episode of care. Conclusions: A continuous and collaborative model of care between the primary health sector and community mental health services might be more beneficial in the early identification and management of the acute crisis in a subgroup of patients. A diverse range of skills are needed for clinicians working in the crisis intervention service in the current times.
参加维多利亚大都会危机干预小组的患者的特点和临床结果
背景:最近在澳大利亚的背景下,人们对寻求危机社区护理的服务用户的性质知之甚少。目的:本研究的目的是描述一个大都市危机干预小组中患者的社会人口学、临床和服务提供特征和12个月的临床结果。方法:选取在研究期间(2015年5月1日- 2015年10月30日)在大都市社区精神卫生团队登记的危机干预患者进行回顾性队列研究。采用社会再适应量表评估引发危机的社会心理应激源类型。结果:情境危机或适应障碍(26.6%)是最常见的初级诊断,其次是情感障碍。故意自残行为是主要的危险行为(18.1%)。自我重大伤害或疾病(16%)是与危机表现相关的主要社会心理压力源。初级保健部门是转诊和出院的主要来源。近40%的患者在指数接触后的12个月内再次转诊。再转诊患者的特征为男性,与室友或其他家庭同住,分类为C类,诊断为情绪障碍,需要药物监督,在护理指数发作期间出院住院治疗。结论:初级卫生部门和社区精神卫生服务之间的持续和协作的护理模式可能更有利于早期识别和管理患者亚组的急性危机。在当今时代,从事危机干预服务的临床医生需要各种各样的技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信