Crowdwork, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Fair Labor Practices

Miriam A. Cherry, Winifred R Poster
{"title":"Crowdwork, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Fair Labor Practices","authors":"Miriam A. Cherry, Winifred R Poster","doi":"10.4337/9781784717766.00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crowdwork, in which large numbers of workers find and perform paid tasks through online platforms, is a paradox. It can make job-matching and production processes more efficient, but it can also lead to a decline in labor standards. We seek to link ethical labor practices in virtual work with well-established notions of corporate social responsibility, that include concerns for worker well-being and fair treatment. We present a typology of trends in labour, and argue that the new phase of ‘crowdwork’ is distinct from previous eras of ‘industrial’ and ‘digital’ employment. The chapter then outlines three best practices for crowdwork. First is fair wages. Second is the need for transparency, or the idea of fully disclosing to crowdworkers information about their tasks, including fair estimates of time and wages, and the larger goals to which their work contributes. Third is due process, that is, ensuring that online ratings of workers are based on fair criteria, and that platforms establish an appeals process for non-payment of wages or poor ratings. Implementation of these practices would offer a better working environment online, and improve the collaborative potential of crowdwork for platforms and workers alike.","PeriodicalId":115265,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Compensation Law (Topic)","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Compensation Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784717766.00022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Crowdwork, in which large numbers of workers find and perform paid tasks through online platforms, is a paradox. It can make job-matching and production processes more efficient, but it can also lead to a decline in labor standards. We seek to link ethical labor practices in virtual work with well-established notions of corporate social responsibility, that include concerns for worker well-being and fair treatment. We present a typology of trends in labour, and argue that the new phase of ‘crowdwork’ is distinct from previous eras of ‘industrial’ and ‘digital’ employment. The chapter then outlines three best practices for crowdwork. First is fair wages. Second is the need for transparency, or the idea of fully disclosing to crowdworkers information about their tasks, including fair estimates of time and wages, and the larger goals to which their work contributes. Third is due process, that is, ensuring that online ratings of workers are based on fair criteria, and that platforms establish an appeals process for non-payment of wages or poor ratings. Implementation of these practices would offer a better working environment online, and improve the collaborative potential of crowdwork for platforms and workers alike.
众筹、企业社会责任和公平劳动实践
大量员工通过在线平台寻找并执行有偿任务的众工(Crowdwork)是一个悖论。它可以使工作匹配和生产过程更有效率,但它也可能导致劳动标准的下降。我们寻求将虚拟工作中的道德劳动实践与企业社会责任的既定概念联系起来,其中包括对工人福利和公平待遇的关注。我们提出了劳动力趋势的类型学,并认为“众工”的新阶段与以前的“工业”和“数字”就业时代截然不同。然后,本章概述了众包的三个最佳实践。首先是公平的工资。其次是透明度的需要,或者是向众包工作者充分披露他们的任务信息的想法,包括对时间和工资的公平估计,以及他们的工作对更大目标的贡献。第三是正当程序,即确保对员工的在线评分基于公平标准,并确保平台为不支付工资或评分不佳的员工建立申诉程序。这些实践的实施将提供一个更好的在线工作环境,并提高平台和员工的协作潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信