Choice contexts and social communication

M. Angelis
{"title":"Choice contexts and social communication","authors":"M. Angelis","doi":"10.1431/88004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigates how one element of the choice context, namely assortment size, influences the tendency to share, both offline and through social networks, positive versus negative purchase or consumption experiences. The idea advanced in this paper is that consumers tend to share positive experiences if such experiences are the outcome of choices made in large assortments, while they tend to share negative experiences if such experiences are the outcome of choices made in small assortments. In other words, product categories presenting a high number of options increase consumers' tendency to talk about positive experiences but decrease consumers' tendency to talk about negative experiences. Such an effect is attributable to the fact that wide assortments, in addition to enhance feelings of information overload, make consumers perceive a relatively higher degree of control over the outcome of their choice, deriving from the fact that consumers have a greater freedom of choice compared to contexts characterized by a few options. This, in turn, leads them to see the positive or negative outcome as the result of their ability to choose. Three experimental studies conducted in different settings provide empirical evidence supporting both the effect and the underlying theoretical mechanisms proposed to drive it.","PeriodicalId":407849,"journal":{"name":"Micro & Macro Marketing","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Micro & Macro Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1431/88004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This research investigates how one element of the choice context, namely assortment size, influences the tendency to share, both offline and through social networks, positive versus negative purchase or consumption experiences. The idea advanced in this paper is that consumers tend to share positive experiences if such experiences are the outcome of choices made in large assortments, while they tend to share negative experiences if such experiences are the outcome of choices made in small assortments. In other words, product categories presenting a high number of options increase consumers' tendency to talk about positive experiences but decrease consumers' tendency to talk about negative experiences. Such an effect is attributable to the fact that wide assortments, in addition to enhance feelings of information overload, make consumers perceive a relatively higher degree of control over the outcome of their choice, deriving from the fact that consumers have a greater freedom of choice compared to contexts characterized by a few options. This, in turn, leads them to see the positive or negative outcome as the result of their ability to choose. Three experimental studies conducted in different settings provide empirical evidence supporting both the effect and the underlying theoretical mechanisms proposed to drive it.
选择环境和社会沟通
本研究调查了选择环境的一个因素,即分类大小,如何影响离线和通过社交网络分享的倾向,积极的还是消极的购买或消费体验。本文提出的观点是,如果这些体验是在大分类中做出的选择的结果,消费者倾向于分享积极的体验,而如果这些体验是在小分类中做出的选择的结果,他们倾向于分享消极的体验。换句话说,提供大量选择的产品类别增加了消费者谈论积极体验的倾向,但减少了消费者谈论消极体验的倾向。这种影响可以归因于这样一个事实,即广泛的分类,除了增强信息过载的感觉之外,还使消费者认为对他们选择的结果有相对更高的控制程度,这一事实源于与少数选择相比,消费者有更大的选择自由。这反过来又引导他们将积极或消极的结果视为他们选择能力的结果。在不同环境下进行的三项实验研究提供了实证证据,支持这一效应及其背后的理论机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信