Religious Freedom and the European Court of Human Rights’ Two Margins of Appreciation

S. Berry
{"title":"Religious Freedom and the European Court of Human Rights’ Two Margins of Appreciation","authors":"S. Berry","doi":"10.1163/18710328-12231145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) use of the margin of appreciation (MoA) in cases concerning religious clothing is well-documented. This article paints a more complete picture of the use of the doctrine in cases falling within Article 9 and Article 2, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The ECtHR’s use of the normative MoA often appears to be superfluous as is does not appear to extend past the Article 9(2) ECHR, limitations clause. In contrast, the systemic MoA allows almost complete deference to the State, which has the potential to undermine the religious freedom of minorities.","PeriodicalId":168375,"journal":{"name":"Religion and Human Rights","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Religion and Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12231145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR) use of the margin of appreciation (MoA) in cases concerning religious clothing is well-documented. This article paints a more complete picture of the use of the doctrine in cases falling within Article 9 and Article 2, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). The ECtHR’s use of the normative MoA often appears to be superfluous as is does not appear to extend past the Article 9(2) ECHR, limitations clause. In contrast, the systemic MoA allows almost complete deference to the State, which has the potential to undermine the religious freedom of minorities.
宗教自由与欧洲人权法院的两个升值空间
欧洲人权法院(ECtHR)在涉及宗教服装的案件中使用增值幅度(MoA)是有据可查的。本文更全面地描述了在《欧洲人权公约》(ECHR)第1议定书第9条和第2条范围内使用该原则的情况。欧洲人权法院对规范性MoA的使用往往显得多余,因为它似乎没有超出《欧洲人权公约》第9(2)条的限制条款。相比之下,系统性的《宗教法》几乎完全服从国家,这有可能破坏少数群体的宗教自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信