A Comparative Analysis of Transnational Private Regulation: Legitimacy, Quality, Effectiveness and Enforcement

F. Cafaggi
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Transnational Private Regulation: Legitimacy, Quality, Effectiveness and Enforcement","authors":"F. Cafaggi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2530516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transnational private regulation (TPR) is a growing phenomenon. It creates new markets and dissolves old ones. TPR contributes to the regulation of existing markets, it increases the protection of fundamental rights and it enables or disables communities to participate in global rule making. The standing of TPR and its role regulatory control continues to grow. TPR presents new characteristics departing from more conventional forms of domestic self-regulation. It reflects a transfer of regulatory power from the domestic to the transnational and from the public to the private sphere with significant distributional consequences. Such transfers modify but do not necessarily reduce the role of States especially in relation to standards’ implementation and enforcement. While there is a common core of similar features across regimes, the degree of sector specificity is high, determined by context-specific institutional and economic factors, different drivers and regulatory needs. The Report addresses the development of transnational private regulation in three macro-areas: financial markets, consumer protection and fundamental rights. It encompasses 11 case studies focusing on four dimensions: legitimacy, quality, effectiveness and enforcement. The 11 case study sectors are briefly outlined in Appendix 1. These case studies have been conducted in the context of the research project Transnational Private Regulation: Constitutional Foundations and Governance Design.","PeriodicalId":313622,"journal":{"name":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transnational Litigation/Arbitration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2530516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Transnational private regulation (TPR) is a growing phenomenon. It creates new markets and dissolves old ones. TPR contributes to the regulation of existing markets, it increases the protection of fundamental rights and it enables or disables communities to participate in global rule making. The standing of TPR and its role regulatory control continues to grow. TPR presents new characteristics departing from more conventional forms of domestic self-regulation. It reflects a transfer of regulatory power from the domestic to the transnational and from the public to the private sphere with significant distributional consequences. Such transfers modify but do not necessarily reduce the role of States especially in relation to standards’ implementation and enforcement. While there is a common core of similar features across regimes, the degree of sector specificity is high, determined by context-specific institutional and economic factors, different drivers and regulatory needs. The Report addresses the development of transnational private regulation in three macro-areas: financial markets, consumer protection and fundamental rights. It encompasses 11 case studies focusing on four dimensions: legitimacy, quality, effectiveness and enforcement. The 11 case study sectors are briefly outlined in Appendix 1. These case studies have been conducted in the context of the research project Transnational Private Regulation: Constitutional Foundations and Governance Design.
跨国私人监管的比较分析:合法性、质量、有效性与执行
跨国私人监管(TPR)是一个日益增长的现象。它创造新市场,瓦解旧市场。TPR有助于监管现有市场,加强对基本权利的保护,并使社区能够或无法参与全球规则制定。TPR的地位及其调控作用不断增强。TPR呈现出与更传统的国内自我监管形式不同的新特征。它反映了监管权力从国内转移到跨国,从公共领域转移到私人领域,具有重大的分配后果。这种转让改变但不一定减少国家的作用,特别是在执行和执行标准方面。虽然各制度都有类似的共同核心特征,但行业特异性程度很高,这取决于具体情况的体制和经济因素、不同的驱动因素和监管需求。报告讨论了三个宏观领域的跨国私人监管发展情况:金融市场、消费者保护和基本权利。它包括11个案例研究,重点关注四个方面:合法性、质量、有效性和执行。附录1简要概述了11个案例研究部门。这些案例研究是在研究项目“跨国私人监管:宪法基础和治理设计”的背景下进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信