Frailty as a predictor of outcome in heart failure in the elderly: An observational study at a tertiary care center

Pratap Kumar, Minakshi Dhar, B. Kumar, Vikram Jain
{"title":"Frailty as a predictor of outcome in heart failure in the elderly: An observational study at a tertiary care center","authors":"Pratap Kumar, Minakshi Dhar, B. Kumar, Vikram Jain","doi":"10.4103/jiag.jiag_12_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Heart failure is the leading contributor to global morbidity and mortality. Frailty is an emerging prognostic factor in heart failure. There is little data on the prognostic role of frailty in patients admitted for acute heart failure as most studies have been done on stable heart failure patients. Methodology: The study included elderly (age ≥60 years) patients admitted with acute heart failure at a tertiary care center in India. Patients with dementia, cognitive impairment, and documented terminal illness were excluded. The sample size was 85 patients. Frailty assessment was done using short performance physical battery (SPPB) and Fried phenotype scales and follow-up data was collected at 3 months postdischarge telephonically. The primary objective of the study was to determine the proportion of frailty in elderly in-hospital heart failure patients. The secondary objectives were to see the agreement between the frailty assessment tools used (SPPB and Fried phenotype). Results: Eighty seven patients were included in the study. The majority were male (n = 45) and had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n = 56). Coronary artery disease (CAD) (n = 60) was the most common cause of heart failure. Eighty-two patients had at least one comorbidity. The proportion of frailty as per the SPPB was 43.67%, and as per the Fried phenotype was 68.9%. A total of 4 deaths and 15 re-admissions occurred during the follow-up period of 3 months. The majority belonged to the frail category as per both the frailty scales (P < 0.001 for SPPB, P = 0.087 for Fried phenotype). Fleiss's kappa coefficient for agreement between the scales was 0.373 (SE = 0.106, P < 0.001), which signifies that there was a fair agreement between the two scales. The Spearman Rank correlation coefficient was −0.691 (P < 0.01) between the two scales. Hence, the SPPB score inversely correlated with the Fried phenotype. Conclusion: Frailty is largely prevalent in elderly heart failure patients. It can be used to predict poor outcomes in these patients. Clinicians should identify these high-risk patients at the time of discharge from their facility and consider interventions (tailored rehabilitation programs) to minimize the adverse outcomes.","PeriodicalId":350641,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Academy of Geriatrics","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Academy of Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jiag.jiag_12_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure is the leading contributor to global morbidity and mortality. Frailty is an emerging prognostic factor in heart failure. There is little data on the prognostic role of frailty in patients admitted for acute heart failure as most studies have been done on stable heart failure patients. Methodology: The study included elderly (age ≥60 years) patients admitted with acute heart failure at a tertiary care center in India. Patients with dementia, cognitive impairment, and documented terminal illness were excluded. The sample size was 85 patients. Frailty assessment was done using short performance physical battery (SPPB) and Fried phenotype scales and follow-up data was collected at 3 months postdischarge telephonically. The primary objective of the study was to determine the proportion of frailty in elderly in-hospital heart failure patients. The secondary objectives were to see the agreement between the frailty assessment tools used (SPPB and Fried phenotype). Results: Eighty seven patients were included in the study. The majority were male (n = 45) and had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n = 56). Coronary artery disease (CAD) (n = 60) was the most common cause of heart failure. Eighty-two patients had at least one comorbidity. The proportion of frailty as per the SPPB was 43.67%, and as per the Fried phenotype was 68.9%. A total of 4 deaths and 15 re-admissions occurred during the follow-up period of 3 months. The majority belonged to the frail category as per both the frailty scales (P < 0.001 for SPPB, P = 0.087 for Fried phenotype). Fleiss's kappa coefficient for agreement between the scales was 0.373 (SE = 0.106, P < 0.001), which signifies that there was a fair agreement between the two scales. The Spearman Rank correlation coefficient was −0.691 (P < 0.01) between the two scales. Hence, the SPPB score inversely correlated with the Fried phenotype. Conclusion: Frailty is largely prevalent in elderly heart failure patients. It can be used to predict poor outcomes in these patients. Clinicians should identify these high-risk patients at the time of discharge from their facility and consider interventions (tailored rehabilitation programs) to minimize the adverse outcomes.
虚弱作为老年人心力衰竭预后的预测因子:一项三级保健中心的观察性研究
导言:心力衰竭是全球发病率和死亡率的主要原因。虚弱是心力衰竭的一个新兴预后因素。由于大多数研究都是在稳定型心力衰竭患者中进行的,因此关于虚弱在急性心力衰竭患者中的预后作用的数据很少。方法:该研究纳入了印度三级医疗中心收治的老年(年龄≥60岁)急性心力衰竭患者。排除痴呆、认知障碍和有记录的绝症患者。样本量为85例。采用短性能物理电池(SPPB)和Fried表型量表进行虚弱评估,并于出院后3个月电话随访数据。该研究的主要目的是确定老年住院心力衰竭患者虚弱的比例。次要目的是观察所使用的脆弱性评估工具(SPPB和Fried表型)之间的一致性。结果:87例患者纳入研究。大多数患者为男性(n = 45),心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(n = 56)。冠状动脉疾病(CAD) (n = 60)是心力衰竭最常见的原因。82例患者至少有一种合并症。SPPB和Fried表型的脆性比例分别为43.67%和68.9%。在3个月的随访期间,共发生4例死亡和15例再入院。根据两种虚弱量表,大多数属于虚弱类别(SPPB P < 0.001, Fried表型P = 0.087)。量表间一致性的Fleiss kappa系数为0.373 (SE = 0.106, P < 0.001),表明两种量表之间具有较好的一致性。两个量表的Spearman秩相关系数为- 0.691 (P < 0.01)。因此,SPPB评分与Fried表型呈负相关。结论:衰弱在老年心力衰竭患者中普遍存在。它可以用来预测这些患者的不良预后。临床医生应在出院时识别这些高危患者,并考虑干预措施(量身定制的康复计划),以尽量减少不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信