Effects of electrode configurations in transcranial direct current stimulation after stroke

K. Chelette, Cheryl Carrico, L. Nichols, Emily Salyers, L. Sawaki
{"title":"Effects of electrode configurations in transcranial direct current stimulation after stroke","authors":"K. Chelette, Cheryl Carrico, L. Nichols, Emily Salyers, L. Sawaki","doi":"10.1109/HealthCom.2014.7001806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation that can modulate neuroplasticity (the capacity for brain reorganization). Neuroplastic change correlates with upper extremity (UE) recovery after brain lesions. Different electrode configurations of tDCS paired with UE motor training can have different effects in distinct populations. We are conducting the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate which tDCS configuration may best enhance outcomes of UE motor training for stroke survivors with chronic, severe hemiparesis (i.e., little or no wrist or hand movement). We have assigned subjects to 1 of 4 groups: 1) “Anodal”: anodal tDCS to excite ipsilesional motor cortex; 2) “Cathodal”: cathodal tDCS to inhibit contralesional motor cortex; 3) “Dual”: a simultaneous combination of anodal and cathodal tDCS; or 4) “Sham” tDCS. Intervention (10 sessions) consists of tDCS followed by 3 hours of intensive, task-oriented UE training in each session. Our primary outcome measure is Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Our secondary outcome measures are Action Research Arm Test and Stroke Impact Scale. We have conducted evaluations at baseline and post-intervention. Preliminary results from 26 of (projected) 44 subjects indicate substantially greater improvement for the “Cathodal” group than other groups. These findings differ from evidence about tDCS in rehabilitation of mild-to-moderate hemiparesis. Completion of our study will include full analysis of neuroplastic change associated with intervention.","PeriodicalId":269964,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 16th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 16th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HealthCom.2014.7001806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a form of non-invasive brain stimulation that can modulate neuroplasticity (the capacity for brain reorganization). Neuroplastic change correlates with upper extremity (UE) recovery after brain lesions. Different electrode configurations of tDCS paired with UE motor training can have different effects in distinct populations. We are conducting the first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate which tDCS configuration may best enhance outcomes of UE motor training for stroke survivors with chronic, severe hemiparesis (i.e., little or no wrist or hand movement). We have assigned subjects to 1 of 4 groups: 1) “Anodal”: anodal tDCS to excite ipsilesional motor cortex; 2) “Cathodal”: cathodal tDCS to inhibit contralesional motor cortex; 3) “Dual”: a simultaneous combination of anodal and cathodal tDCS; or 4) “Sham” tDCS. Intervention (10 sessions) consists of tDCS followed by 3 hours of intensive, task-oriented UE training in each session. Our primary outcome measure is Fugl-Meyer Assessment. Our secondary outcome measures are Action Research Arm Test and Stroke Impact Scale. We have conducted evaluations at baseline and post-intervention. Preliminary results from 26 of (projected) 44 subjects indicate substantially greater improvement for the “Cathodal” group than other groups. These findings differ from evidence about tDCS in rehabilitation of mild-to-moderate hemiparesis. Completion of our study will include full analysis of neuroplastic change associated with intervention.
脑卒中后经颅直流电刺激中电极配置的影响
经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)是一种非侵入性脑刺激,可以调节神经可塑性(大脑重组的能力)。脑损伤后神经可塑性改变与上肢(UE)恢复相关。tDCS与UE运动训练相结合的不同电极配置在不同人群中具有不同的效果。我们正在进行第一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,以研究哪种tDCS配置可以最好地提高患有慢性严重偏瘫(即很少或没有手腕或手运动)的中风幸存者的UE运动训练结果。我们将受试者分为4组:1)“阳极”:通过阳极tDCS刺激同侧运动皮层;2)“负向”:负向tDCS抑制对侧运动皮层;3)“双”:同时结合阳极和阴极tDCS;或4)“假”tDCS。干预(10个疗程)包括tDCS,然后是每个疗程3小时的任务导向的强化UE培训。我们的主要结果测量是Fugl-Meyer评估。我们的次要结果测量是行动研究臂测试和中风影响量表。我们在基线和干预后进行了评估。对44名(预计)受试者中的26名进行的初步结果表明,“天主教”组比其他组有更大的改善。这些发现与tDCS在轻中度偏瘫康复中的证据不同。完成我们的研究将包括与干预相关的神经可塑性变化的全面分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信