Contrast of Paddle wheel technique and standard axial CT displayed significantly high sensitivity and specificity in detecting central pulmonary embolism

Y. Chug
{"title":"Contrast of Paddle wheel technique and standard axial CT displayed significantly high sensitivity and specificity in detecting central pulmonary embolism","authors":"Y. Chug","doi":"10.31579/JCITR.2018/006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Paddle wheel technique is a reconstruction method of displaying images, which uses planar slabs pivot on the central horizontal axis at bifurcation of pulmonary artery trunk. With this method, each image depicts complete track of branching structures from central hilum to the periphery. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the role of paddle wheel reformation and compare it with standard axial multi detector CT images in cases of pulmonary embolism. Methods: CT scans of 50 patients presented for CT pulmonary angiography were selected and interpreted by two radiologists using reformatted paddle wheel technique besides standard axial CT scans. The scans were reviewed independently and randomly to reduce bias. Standard axial CT scan for pulmonary embolism was carried out with collimation of 1.25 mm, pitch of six and a reconstruction interval of 0.8 mm. Paddle wheel reconstruction was carried out by using inbuilt software, setting 5 mm slab thickness and 5 degree rotation. Reference standard was overall interpretation of axial CT scans by both the radiologists. Results: Sensitivity and specificity for axial images was between 90 to 100%; sensitivity for paddle wheel technique ranged from 65 to 72% while specificity turned out to be 80 to 100%. Final consensus agreement for standard axial imaging was higher than paddle wheel technique. Conclusion: No significant difference between two imaging methods was noted in cases of central pulmonary embolism, however standard axial imaging was better than paddle wheel technique in detecting peripheral pulmonary embolism.","PeriodicalId":196675,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging and Interventional Radiology","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/JCITR.2018/006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Paddle wheel technique is a reconstruction method of displaying images, which uses planar slabs pivot on the central horizontal axis at bifurcation of pulmonary artery trunk. With this method, each image depicts complete track of branching structures from central hilum to the periphery. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the role of paddle wheel reformation and compare it with standard axial multi detector CT images in cases of pulmonary embolism. Methods: CT scans of 50 patients presented for CT pulmonary angiography were selected and interpreted by two radiologists using reformatted paddle wheel technique besides standard axial CT scans. The scans were reviewed independently and randomly to reduce bias. Standard axial CT scan for pulmonary embolism was carried out with collimation of 1.25 mm, pitch of six and a reconstruction interval of 0.8 mm. Paddle wheel reconstruction was carried out by using inbuilt software, setting 5 mm slab thickness and 5 degree rotation. Reference standard was overall interpretation of axial CT scans by both the radiologists. Results: Sensitivity and specificity for axial images was between 90 to 100%; sensitivity for paddle wheel technique ranged from 65 to 72% while specificity turned out to be 80 to 100%. Final consensus agreement for standard axial imaging was higher than paddle wheel technique. Conclusion: No significant difference between two imaging methods was noted in cases of central pulmonary embolism, however standard axial imaging was better than paddle wheel technique in detecting peripheral pulmonary embolism.
桨轮技术与标准轴位CT的对比显示,对中枢性肺栓塞的检测具有较高的敏感性和特异性
桨轮技术是一种以肺动脉干分叉处的中央水平轴为支点的平面图像重建显示方法。通过这种方法,每张图像都描绘了从中央门到周围分支结构的完整轨迹。目的:探讨肺栓塞患者桨轮造影的作用,并与标准轴向多层螺旋CT图像进行比较。方法:选择50例行肺血管造影的患者的CT片,由2名放射科医师在标准轴向CT扫描的基础上,采用重新格式化桨轮技术对其进行解读。为减少偏倚,对扫描进行了独立和随机的审查。进行肺栓塞标准轴位CT扫描,准直1.25 mm,螺距6,重建间隔0.8 mm。利用内置软件进行桨轮重构,设置5 mm板厚,旋转5度。参考标准是两位放射科医生对轴向CT扫描的整体解读。结果:轴向图像的灵敏度和特异度在90 ~ 100%之间;桨轮技术的敏感性为65% ~ 72%,特异性为80% ~ 100%。标准轴向成像的最终一致性高于桨轮技术。结论:两种影像学检查方法对中枢性肺栓塞的诊断无显著性差异,但标准轴向影像学检查对周围性肺栓塞的诊断优于桨轮影像学检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信