Services personalization in digital academic libraries: a Delphi study

Samaneh Khavidaki, S. R. Sharifabadi, A. Ghaebi
{"title":"Services personalization in digital academic libraries: a Delphi study","authors":"Samaneh Khavidaki, S. R. Sharifabadi, A. Ghaebi","doi":"10.1108/dlp-03-2022-0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to explore the realm of literature about personalization of digital library services. This paper focuses on users’ unique needs and will identify different types of personalized services. Therefore, this study has identified different types of services personalization in the context of digital academic libraries.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn this research, the systematic review method has been used to obtain the relevant indicators of different types of personalization in the context of libraries. To explain basic indicators, a Delphi method has been used. The Delphi panel’s members consisted of 15 experts (faculty members, researchers, professional users and software designers). A purposeful sampling and the Delphi fulfillment process were performed in three rounds. After collecting data, descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation), inferential statistics (binomial distribution test) and the Kendall coordination coefficient were used to determine the consensus rate among experts.\n\n\nFindings\nA total of 103 indicators were extracted for different types of personalization through a systematic literature review. Of these, 90 indicators were considered significant in the experts’ view. Generally, content personalization, interactive personalization, collaborative personalization and information retrieval personalization are the main components of personalization types, each of which has its own indicators.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study has dealt with the issue of what is personalized in the context of digital academic library. The findings should be helpful and effective in the development of a holistic view on personalization of services in digital libraries.\n","PeriodicalId":438470,"journal":{"name":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digit. Libr. Perspect.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dlp-03-2022-0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to explore the realm of literature about personalization of digital library services. This paper focuses on users’ unique needs and will identify different types of personalized services. Therefore, this study has identified different types of services personalization in the context of digital academic libraries. Design/methodology/approach In this research, the systematic review method has been used to obtain the relevant indicators of different types of personalization in the context of libraries. To explain basic indicators, a Delphi method has been used. The Delphi panel’s members consisted of 15 experts (faculty members, researchers, professional users and software designers). A purposeful sampling and the Delphi fulfillment process were performed in three rounds. After collecting data, descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation), inferential statistics (binomial distribution test) and the Kendall coordination coefficient were used to determine the consensus rate among experts. Findings A total of 103 indicators were extracted for different types of personalization through a systematic literature review. Of these, 90 indicators were considered significant in the experts’ view. Generally, content personalization, interactive personalization, collaborative personalization and information retrieval personalization are the main components of personalization types, each of which has its own indicators. Originality/value This study has dealt with the issue of what is personalized in the context of digital academic library. The findings should be helpful and effective in the development of a holistic view on personalization of services in digital libraries.
数字化高校图书馆服务个性化:德尔菲研究
目的探讨数字图书馆个性化服务的文献研究领域。本文着眼于用户的独特需求,并将识别不同类型的个性化服务。因此,本研究确定了数字化学术图书馆背景下不同类型的服务个性化。设计/方法/途径本研究采用系统评价的方法,获得了图书馆背景下不同类型个性化的相关指标。为了解释基本指标,采用了德尔菲法。德尔福小组的成员由15名专家(教师、研究人员、专业用户和软件设计师)组成。有目的的抽样和德尔菲履行过程进行了三轮。收集数据后,采用描述性统计(均值和标准差)、推理统计(二项分布检验)和Kendall协调系数来确定专家的共识率。通过系统的文献回顾,共提取了103个不同类型个性化的指标。在这些指标中,专家认为有90个指标是重要的。一般来说,内容个性化、交互个性化、协同个性化和信息检索个性化是个性化类型的主要组成部分,每种类型都有自己的指标。原创性/价值本研究探讨了数字化学术图书馆中什么是个性化的问题。研究结果将有助于对数字图书馆个性化服务的整体看法的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信