Populist radical right mainstreaming and challenges to democracy in an enlarged Europe

Bartek Pytlas
{"title":"Populist radical right mainstreaming and challenges to democracy in an enlarged Europe","authors":"Bartek Pytlas","doi":"10.4324/9781315144993-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Populist radical right (PRR) politics became increasingly established in the political mainstream and continues to challenge the values and legitimacy of liberal democracy. In Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), especially the cases of Hungary and Poland showcase the palpable consequences of these developments. Yet, as several scholars note, democratic erosion in these two countries took place despite their performance as role models of democratic consolidation. Concurrently, consolidated democracies in Western Europe are by no means immune to the rising mainstream legitimacy of PRR politics. Thus, despite the varying intensity of these phenomena across Europe, observing how PRR politics is being normalised within the mainstream of CEE democracies can provide important lessons that increasingly go beyond the contextual specificities of this region. \nExtant research has put increased attention on the impact of populism and nativism on liberal democracy. Yet, there is still need to explore how political entrepreneurs use these narratives in the political process to establish and most especially uphold mainstream legitimacy of illiberal politics and policies. By observing the phenomenon of PRR mainstreaming and the related challenges to liberal democracy in CEE from an actor-centred perspective, this paper thus aims to contribute to complementing the conceptual understanding of these mechanisms and processes. The study shows that while PRR parties continue to pose a major challenge to liberal democracy, political agency of established parties at the same time plays a pivotal role in the reciprocal spiral of legitimation of PRR politics – including the illiberal framing of democracy used to transport its nativist core ideology. The ability of PRR narratives to gain broader mainstream legitimacy thus results not only from mainstreaming strategies by PRR parties, but is also galvanized through the mainstreaming of PRR politics by established parties. Concurrently, where established parties adopted the overarching ultranationalist as well as anti-establishment PRR frame, they fostered its normalisation as an illiberal counter-narrative of both mainstream values and the democratic ideal. Once in absolute power, they ultimately deployed it to legitimize democratic deconsolidation in the name of “democracy” itself.","PeriodicalId":414117,"journal":{"name":"Trumping the Mainstream","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trumping the Mainstream","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315144993-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Populist radical right (PRR) politics became increasingly established in the political mainstream and continues to challenge the values and legitimacy of liberal democracy. In Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), especially the cases of Hungary and Poland showcase the palpable consequences of these developments. Yet, as several scholars note, democratic erosion in these two countries took place despite their performance as role models of democratic consolidation. Concurrently, consolidated democracies in Western Europe are by no means immune to the rising mainstream legitimacy of PRR politics. Thus, despite the varying intensity of these phenomena across Europe, observing how PRR politics is being normalised within the mainstream of CEE democracies can provide important lessons that increasingly go beyond the contextual specificities of this region. Extant research has put increased attention on the impact of populism and nativism on liberal democracy. Yet, there is still need to explore how political entrepreneurs use these narratives in the political process to establish and most especially uphold mainstream legitimacy of illiberal politics and policies. By observing the phenomenon of PRR mainstreaming and the related challenges to liberal democracy in CEE from an actor-centred perspective, this paper thus aims to contribute to complementing the conceptual understanding of these mechanisms and processes. The study shows that while PRR parties continue to pose a major challenge to liberal democracy, political agency of established parties at the same time plays a pivotal role in the reciprocal spiral of legitimation of PRR politics – including the illiberal framing of democracy used to transport its nativist core ideology. The ability of PRR narratives to gain broader mainstream legitimacy thus results not only from mainstreaming strategies by PRR parties, but is also galvanized through the mainstreaming of PRR politics by established parties. Concurrently, where established parties adopted the overarching ultranationalist as well as anti-establishment PRR frame, they fostered its normalisation as an illiberal counter-narrative of both mainstream values and the democratic ideal. Once in absolute power, they ultimately deployed it to legitimize democratic deconsolidation in the name of “democracy” itself.
民粹主义极右翼主流化和扩大后欧洲民主面临的挑战
民粹主义激进右翼政治日益成为政治主流,并继续挑战自由民主的价值观和合法性。在中欧和东欧(CEE),特别是匈牙利和波兰的情况显示了这些发展的明显后果。然而,正如几位学者指出的那样,尽管这两个国家是巩固民主的榜样,但它们的民主遭到了侵蚀。与此同时,西欧巩固的民主国家绝不可能不受PRR政治日益上升的主流合法性的影响。因此,尽管这些现象在欧洲各地的强度各不相同,但观察中东欧民主国家的主流政治是如何正常化的,可以提供越来越超出该地区具体背景的重要经验教训。现有的研究越来越关注民粹主义和本土主义对自由民主的影响。然而,仍然需要探索政治企业家如何在政治过程中使用这些叙事来建立,尤其是维护非自由主义政治和政策的主流合法性。通过从行动者为中心的角度观察PRR主流化现象以及中东欧自由民主面临的相关挑战,本文旨在补充对这些机制和过程的概念性理解。研究表明,虽然PRR政党继续对自由民主构成重大挑战,但同时,老牌政党的政治代理在PRR政治合法化的相互螺旋中发挥着关键作用——包括用于运输其本土主义核心意识形态的民主的非自由框架。因此,PRR叙事获得更广泛的主流合法性的能力不仅源于PRR政党的主流化战略,而且还得益于老牌政党将PRR政治主流化。与此同时,在建制政党采纳极端民族主义和反建制PRR框架的地方,它们促进了其正常化,将其作为主流价值观和民主理想的非自由反叙事。一旦掌握了绝对权力,他们最终以“民主”本身的名义,将民主的解体合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信