Regulating Private Placements in China: A Principled Approach

Christopher John Gulinello
{"title":"Regulating Private Placements in China: A Principled Approach","authors":"Christopher John Gulinello","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2228356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As China’s economy continues to grow and mature, the market for private placements will also grow. Economic prosperity will result in a greater number of investors seeking investment opportunities. Prosperity will also result in the greater demand for goods and services, fueling the creation of more businesses that require capital. As China confronts this market reality, it must decide its legal response to the private-placement market. China is still in the early stages of deciding what sort of legal regime should govern its private-placement market. As it stands now, private placements in China are effectively governed by one provision in the Securities Law of the People’s Republic of China. This article explores what approach China should take in regulating its private placements. In the end, this article can provide no ultimate truths as to whether China should approach securities regulations with a heavy hand or a light one. The author recommends erring on the side of less regulation, rather than more. Whether that path is the correct one for China requires more reflection and consideration by Chinese policy-makers. For any approach Chinese policy-makers adopt to regulate private placements, they should adhere to certain principles: First, private-placement laws and interpretations must be based on a careful understanding and balancing of the costs and benefits of the proposed regulation. Second, private-placement laws must be drafted clearly and made easily accessible to the public to reduce compliance costs. Third, interpretations of laws must be intellectually legitimate – they must logically follow from the language and purpose of the law.","PeriodicalId":157459,"journal":{"name":"ERPN: Securities Law & Public Offerings (Sub-Topic)","volume":"50 7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERPN: Securities Law & Public Offerings (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2228356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As China’s economy continues to grow and mature, the market for private placements will also grow. Economic prosperity will result in a greater number of investors seeking investment opportunities. Prosperity will also result in the greater demand for goods and services, fueling the creation of more businesses that require capital. As China confronts this market reality, it must decide its legal response to the private-placement market. China is still in the early stages of deciding what sort of legal regime should govern its private-placement market. As it stands now, private placements in China are effectively governed by one provision in the Securities Law of the People’s Republic of China. This article explores what approach China should take in regulating its private placements. In the end, this article can provide no ultimate truths as to whether China should approach securities regulations with a heavy hand or a light one. The author recommends erring on the side of less regulation, rather than more. Whether that path is the correct one for China requires more reflection and consideration by Chinese policy-makers. For any approach Chinese policy-makers adopt to regulate private placements, they should adhere to certain principles: First, private-placement laws and interpretations must be based on a careful understanding and balancing of the costs and benefits of the proposed regulation. Second, private-placement laws must be drafted clearly and made easily accessible to the public to reduce compliance costs. Third, interpretations of laws must be intellectually legitimate – they must logically follow from the language and purpose of the law.
中国私募监管:原则性途径
随着中国经济的持续增长和成熟,私募市场也将增长。经济繁荣将导致更多的投资者寻求投资机会。繁荣还将导致对商品和服务的更大需求,推动更多需要资本的企业的诞生。面对这一市场现实,中国必须决定如何从法律上应对私募市场。中国仍处于决定以何种法律制度管理私募市场的早期阶段。就目前而言,中国的私募实际上受到《中华人民共和国证券法》的一条规定的约束。本文探讨了中国在规范私募方面应采取的措施。最后,这篇文章并不能提供最终的真相,即中国在证券监管方面应该采取重拳还是轻拳。作者建议,错误的做法是减少监管,而不是增加监管。这条道路对中国来说是否正确,需要中国决策者进行更多的反思和考虑。对于中国政策制定者采取的任何监管私募的方法,他们都应该坚持以下原则:首先,私募法律和解释必须基于对拟议监管的成本和收益的仔细理解和平衡。其次,私募法律必须起草清楚,并使公众容易获得,以减少合规成本。第三,对法律的解释必须在理智上是合法的——它们必须在逻辑上遵循法律的语言和目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信