MAP: A method of multiattributive prognostication of mineral resources estimation

S. Vujić
{"title":"MAP: A method of multiattributive prognostication of mineral resources estimation","authors":"S. Vujić","doi":"10.1201/9781003078661-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analytical process of prognosticating mineral resources on a particular terrain is based on the recognition \nof different indicators, namely, features (geological, geochemical, geophysical, etc.) as well as on correlative binding to \na certain type of deposit and metallogenic environment. Prognostication is grounded on the very concept of balance, \nwhich means a definition of the overall relative significance of groups of features (attributes), and relies generally, \nwithin this process, on both geological information on the characteristic features of mineralization and information on \nspecific features for the particular type of deposit and metallogenic environment.\nThis may be reached by structuring a prognostication problem, the solution of which requires the involvement of \nseveral persons (experts) aiming to define objectively the criteria to determine the degree of significance of attributes, \ngeneralize preferences for a single group of attributes, state precisely a composite-normalized vector of estimation, and \ndefine the ranks and composite vectors of prognostication.\nIn principle, prognostication is an extremely complex process due, as a rule, to a fuzzy nature of indicators, the \nincorporation of numerous attributes and complex correlation bonds.\nThis leads to the conclusion that it is impossible to automatize completely the process of prognostication using \nmathematical-modelling and computerization, and that a pragmatic solution of the problem should be found in a hybrid \napproach by combining expert knowledge and logistic support offered by mathematics and computer technology.\nThese are the basic principles of the Method of Multiattributive Prognostication, abbreviated to MAP, which is \npresented below.","PeriodicalId":158802,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in the Mineral Industries","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in the Mineral Industries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003078661-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The analytical process of prognosticating mineral resources on a particular terrain is based on the recognition of different indicators, namely, features (geological, geochemical, geophysical, etc.) as well as on correlative binding to a certain type of deposit and metallogenic environment. Prognostication is grounded on the very concept of balance, which means a definition of the overall relative significance of groups of features (attributes), and relies generally, within this process, on both geological information on the characteristic features of mineralization and information on specific features for the particular type of deposit and metallogenic environment. This may be reached by structuring a prognostication problem, the solution of which requires the involvement of several persons (experts) aiming to define objectively the criteria to determine the degree of significance of attributes, generalize preferences for a single group of attributes, state precisely a composite-normalized vector of estimation, and define the ranks and composite vectors of prognostication. In principle, prognostication is an extremely complex process due, as a rule, to a fuzzy nature of indicators, the incorporation of numerous attributes and complex correlation bonds. This leads to the conclusion that it is impossible to automatize completely the process of prognostication using mathematical-modelling and computerization, and that a pragmatic solution of the problem should be found in a hybrid approach by combining expert knowledge and logistic support offered by mathematics and computer technology. These are the basic principles of the Method of Multiattributive Prognostication, abbreviated to MAP, which is presented below.
MAP:一种矿产资源估算的多属性预测方法
特定地形矿产资源预测的分析过程是基于对不同指标即特征(地质、地球化学、地球物理等)的识别,以及与某一类型矿床和成矿环境的关联。预测是建立在平衡概念的基础上的,这意味着对特征(属性)组的总体相对重要性的定义,并且在这一过程中,通常依赖于关于矿化特征的地质信息和关于特定类型的矿床和成矿环境的特定特征的信息。这可以通过构建一个预测问题来实现,该问题的解决需要几个人(专家)的参与,目的是客观地定义确定属性重要程度的标准,概括一组属性的偏好,精确地表示估计的复合归一化向量,并定义预测的秩和复合向量。原则上,预测是一个极其复杂的过程,通常是由于指标的模糊性、众多属性的结合和复杂的关联关系。由此得出的结论是,使用数学建模和计算机化完全自动化预测过程是不可能的,应该通过结合数学和计算机技术提供的专家知识和后勤支持的混合方法找到问题的实用解决方案。这些是多属性预测法(简称MAP)的基本原则,如下所示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信