Determining if There is a Relationship Between How Much Time a Faculty Member Spends Assessing Student Assignments and Final Grades at a Rural University: A One Year Analysis

G. Keller, Allen J. Klingenberg
{"title":"Determining if There is a Relationship Between How Much Time a Faculty Member Spends Assessing Student Assignments and Final Grades at a Rural University: A One Year Analysis","authors":"G. Keller, Allen J. Klingenberg","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3728143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[This research paper was an extension of a previous study that evaluated if there were statistically significant relationships between the amount of time students spent on course assignments and final course grades. The focus of this exploratory investigation was to ascertain if there were statistically significant associations between the amount of time a faculty member spent reading, assessing and grading student assignments and the final grade given. In this investigation the researcher utilized data recorded from the University’s Canvas Learning Management System (LMS) regarding his total activity time spent evaluating student assignments for the same 11 courses (5 face-to-face, 6 online) taught by this researcher during the 2018 academic year. The total student population consisted of 308 students enrolled in a small, liberal arts, rural public university located in the Pacific Northwest. <br><br>Four main discoveries were derived from this exploratory research investigation; a) data derived from this study supports the premise that when a faculty member allocates more time to carefully review student assignments, greater grade variations occur with a Chi-Square of 289.5 significant at the .005 level; b) statistically significant differences were found between the instructor’s total activity time spent in the Learning Management System and grades assigned to undergraduate male and female students enrolled in Principles of Management courses taught by the faculty member, with a Chi-Square of 56.7 significant at the .05 level; c) no statistically significant difference was found between the instructor’s total activity time spent in the Learning Management System and course grades of Masters degree students enrolled in face to face and online courses and d) a statistical significant relationship was found between the instructor’s total activity time spent in the Learning Management System and course grades of students enrolled in face to face courses taught by the faculty member, with a Chi-Square of 26.89 significant at the .05 level. Two suggestions for future research on this topic are suggested; more research needs to be conducted on how much time faculty spend evaluating student assignments and expanding the number of subjects in the research population (faculty and students) that can enlarge the amount and diversity of courses and disciplines observed to create a baseline from which further research can be conducted and perhaps drive improvements regarding student study and faculty grading methodologies. <br><br><br><br>","PeriodicalId":173713,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy eJournal","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3728143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

[This research paper was an extension of a previous study that evaluated if there were statistically significant relationships between the amount of time students spent on course assignments and final course grades. The focus of this exploratory investigation was to ascertain if there were statistically significant associations between the amount of time a faculty member spent reading, assessing and grading student assignments and the final grade given. In this investigation the researcher utilized data recorded from the University’s Canvas Learning Management System (LMS) regarding his total activity time spent evaluating student assignments for the same 11 courses (5 face-to-face, 6 online) taught by this researcher during the 2018 academic year. The total student population consisted of 308 students enrolled in a small, liberal arts, rural public university located in the Pacific Northwest.

Four main discoveries were derived from this exploratory research investigation; a) data derived from this study supports the premise that when a faculty member allocates more time to carefully review student assignments, greater grade variations occur with a Chi-Square of 289.5 significant at the .005 level; b) statistically significant differences were found between the instructor’s total activity time spent in the Learning Management System and grades assigned to undergraduate male and female students enrolled in Principles of Management courses taught by the faculty member, with a Chi-Square of 56.7 significant at the .05 level; c) no statistically significant difference was found between the instructor’s total activity time spent in the Learning Management System and course grades of Masters degree students enrolled in face to face and online courses and d) a statistical significant relationship was found between the instructor’s total activity time spent in the Learning Management System and course grades of students enrolled in face to face courses taught by the faculty member, with a Chi-Square of 26.89 significant at the .05 level. Two suggestions for future research on this topic are suggested; more research needs to be conducted on how much time faculty spend evaluating student assignments and expanding the number of subjects in the research population (faculty and students) that can enlarge the amount and diversity of courses and disciplines observed to create a baseline from which further research can be conducted and perhaps drive improvements regarding student study and faculty grading methodologies.



确定一所农村大学教师评估学生作业的时间与最终成绩之间是否存在关系:一项为期一年的分析
[这篇研究论文是先前一项研究的延伸,该研究评估了学生花在课程作业上的时间与最终课程成绩之间是否存在统计学上显著的关系。]这项探索性调查的重点是确定教师花在阅读、评估和评分学生作业上的时间与给出的最终分数之间是否存在统计学上显著的关联。在这项调查中,研究人员利用了大学Canvas学习管理系统(LMS)记录的数据,该数据记录了他在2018学年评估学生作业所花费的总活动时间,这些课程是由该研究人员教授的11门课程(5门面对面课程,6门在线课程)。学生总数由308名学生组成,他们就读于位于太平洋西北地区的一所小型文理乡村公立大学。这一探索性研究有四个主要发现;a)本研究得出的数据支持这样一个前提,即当教师分配更多的时间来仔细审查学生的作业时,出现更大的成绩差异,卡方为289.5,在0.005水平上显著;b)讲师在学习管理系统中花费的总活动时间与教授管理学原理课程的本科男女学生的成绩之间存在统计学显著差异,卡方为56.7,在0.05水平上具有显著性;c)讲师在学习管理系统上花费的总活动时间与参加面对面和在线课程的硕士学位学生的课程成绩之间没有统计学上的显著差异,d)教师在学习管理系统上花费的总活动时间与参加由教师讲授的面对面课程的学生的课程成绩之间存在统计学上的显著关系。卡方检验为26.89,在0.05水平上具有显著性。对今后的研究提出了两点建议;需要进行更多的研究,了解教师花多少时间来评估学生的作业,并扩大研究对象的数量(教师和学生),这可以扩大观察到的课程和学科的数量和多样性,从而建立一个基线,以便进行进一步的研究,并可能推动学生学习和教师评分方法的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信