Discriminating fingermarks with evidential value for forensic comparison

J. Kotzerke, Stephen A. Davis, Robert Hayes, L. Spreeuwers, R. Veldhuis, K. Horadam
{"title":"Discriminating fingermarks with evidential value for forensic comparison","authors":"J. Kotzerke, Stephen A. Davis, Robert Hayes, L. Spreeuwers, R. Veldhuis, K. Horadam","doi":"10.1109/IWBF.2015.7110220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law enforcement agencies all around the world are using biometrics and especially fingerprints to solve and fight crime. Often forensic experts are needed to record fingermarks at crime scenes and to ensure that those captured are of forensic value. In times of increased demand for forensic services, this process needs to be automated and streamlined as much as possible to improve efficiency and reduce workload. Hence, we investigate if the forensic evidential value (suitability for forensic analysis and/or examination) of fingermark images can be determined at an early stage automatically without any expert involvement, especially when using a mobile phone camera. We explore different factors such as the capture device and the constraints inferred, image feature sets and classifiers used, and their interplay. A database of 1;428 pseudo fingermarks has been collected and its ground truth, whether a mark is of forensic value or not, has been determined by 3 experts. The lowest equal error rate achieved, when using a mobile phone to capture the marks, is 13:62%. These promising results suggest that it might be possible to streamline forensic procedures by the application of an independent automated tool to assist with certain tasks.","PeriodicalId":416816,"journal":{"name":"3rd International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF 2015)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3rd International Workshop on Biometrics and Forensics (IWBF 2015)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWBF.2015.7110220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Law enforcement agencies all around the world are using biometrics and especially fingerprints to solve and fight crime. Often forensic experts are needed to record fingermarks at crime scenes and to ensure that those captured are of forensic value. In times of increased demand for forensic services, this process needs to be automated and streamlined as much as possible to improve efficiency and reduce workload. Hence, we investigate if the forensic evidential value (suitability for forensic analysis and/or examination) of fingermark images can be determined at an early stage automatically without any expert involvement, especially when using a mobile phone camera. We explore different factors such as the capture device and the constraints inferred, image feature sets and classifiers used, and their interplay. A database of 1;428 pseudo fingermarks has been collected and its ground truth, whether a mark is of forensic value or not, has been determined by 3 experts. The lowest equal error rate achieved, when using a mobile phone to capture the marks, is 13:62%. These promising results suggest that it might be possible to streamline forensic procedures by the application of an independent automated tool to assist with certain tasks.
鉴别具有法医比对证据价值的指纹
世界各地的执法机构都在使用生物识别技术,尤其是指纹技术来解决和打击犯罪。通常需要法医专家在犯罪现场记录指纹,并确保捕获的指纹具有法医价值。在对法医服务需求增加的时候,这一过程需要尽可能地自动化和精简,以提高效率和减少工作量。因此,我们调查了指纹图像的法医证据价值(法医分析和/或检查的适用性)是否可以在没有任何专家参与的情况下在早期阶段自动确定,特别是在使用手机相机时。我们探讨了不同的因素,如捕获设备和推断的约束,图像特征集和使用的分类器,以及它们的相互作用。收集了1428个伪手印数据库,并由3名专家对其是否具有法医学价值进行了判断。当使用手机捕捉分数时,达到的最低相等错误率为13:62%。这些有希望的结果表明,通过应用独立的自动化工具来协助完成某些任务,可能会简化法医程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信