Reliability profile of an information source: The most basic version

A. Nedeljkovic
{"title":"Reliability profile of an information source: The most basic version","authors":"A. Nedeljkovic","doi":"10.2298/theo2001107n","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is an attempt at analyses and reconciliation of some\n prima facie confronted theories of reliability in the context of formal\n theories of coherence. Formal coherentists attempted to show that there is\n an epistemologically interesting connection between coherence of an\n information set and reliability of information sources. Amongst these\n authors there are divisions and differences concerning the nature of\n coherence, as well as the nature of reliability. On the one side, we have\n before us probabilistic coherentists who support a statistical understanding\n of reliability. On the other side we have supporters of explanatory\n coherence who see reliability as a dispostition. There are two goals that we\n shall attempt to achieve in this paper: to present and explain some ideas of\n reliability, without going into fine detailes and depths of theories in\n which they were formulated and to show that those ideas about reliability\n are not that irreconcilable as they might appear, but that they together can\n form something that we shall call ?reliability profile of an information\n source?, ?the most basic version?, or shorter: RPISbasic.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoria, Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2001107n","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is an attempt at analyses and reconciliation of some prima facie confronted theories of reliability in the context of formal theories of coherence. Formal coherentists attempted to show that there is an epistemologically interesting connection between coherence of an information set and reliability of information sources. Amongst these authors there are divisions and differences concerning the nature of coherence, as well as the nature of reliability. On the one side, we have before us probabilistic coherentists who support a statistical understanding of reliability. On the other side we have supporters of explanatory coherence who see reliability as a dispostition. There are two goals that we shall attempt to achieve in this paper: to present and explain some ideas of reliability, without going into fine detailes and depths of theories in which they were formulated and to show that those ideas about reliability are not that irreconcilable as they might appear, but that they together can form something that we shall call ?reliability profile of an information source?, ?the most basic version?, or shorter: RPISbasic.
信息源的可靠性概况:最基本的版本
本文的目的是试图在连贯的形式理论的背景下分析和调和一些初步面临的可靠性理论。形式连贯主义者试图表明,在信息集的一致性和信息源的可靠性之间存在着一种认识论上有趣的联系。在这些作者之间有分歧和分歧关于连贯的性质,以及可靠性的性质。一方面,摆在我们面前的是概率连贯论者,他们支持对可靠性的统计理解。另一方面,我们有解释一致性的支持者,他们认为可靠性是一种性格。在本文中,我们将尝试实现两个目标:一是提出并解释一些可靠性的概念,而不是深入研究它们形成的理论的细节和深度;二是表明这些关于可靠性的概念并不像它们看起来那样不可调和,而是它们一起可以形成我们称之为“信息源的可靠性概况”的东西。最基本的版本?,或更短:RPISbasic。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信