Passive exposure of COPD patients to e-cigarette vape - a double-blinded exposure chamber study

K. R. Laursen, Jakob Boenloekke, M. Bilde, M. Glasius, E. Bendstrup, P. Ravn, V. Schlünssen, S. Kjærgaard, T. Sigsgaard
{"title":"Passive exposure of COPD patients to e-cigarette vape - a double-blinded exposure chamber study","authors":"K. R. Laursen, Jakob Boenloekke, M. Bilde, M. Glasius, E. Bendstrup, P. Ravn, V. Schlünssen, S. Kjærgaard, T. Sigsgaard","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA1722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of e-cigarettes continues to grow worldwide. The assumption that e-cigarettes are less harmful than cigarettes has not been properly researched. In particular, studies on passive vaping by sensitive subgroups of the population are virtually non-existent. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience adverse effects of short-term passive exposure to e-cigarette vape. Here we present the results of preliminary statistical analyses performed before decoding exposures. Methods: In a climate chamber, we performed a double-blinded cross-over study with exposures lasting 3h to passive vaping or clean air among subjects with moderately severe COPD. We studied pulmonary function, exhaled NO and 28 self-reported symptoms before, during and after the exposures. Results: Sixteen patients (6 female; 10 male) with a mean age of 68 years recruited from an outpatient clinic completed the study. At entry the mean FEV1 was 1.43 L (53% of predicted), FVC was 2.53 L (74% of predicted) with a FEV1/FVC ratio of 0.57. FEV1 improved during the exposures and none of the exposures affected lung function negatively. The only symptom reported to be augmented during one compared with the other exposure was “current strength of smell” (p=0.038). Conclusion: Based on the preliminary analysis it appears that at the exposure levels in the present study, pulmonary function in patients with COPD was not affected by passive vaping. The study also suggests that blinding of e-cigarette vape exposure is difficult to obtain due to the odor. It also suggests that the odor itself did not affect lung function.","PeriodicalId":212819,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco, smoking control and health education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco, smoking control and health education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA1722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of e-cigarettes continues to grow worldwide. The assumption that e-cigarettes are less harmful than cigarettes has not been properly researched. In particular, studies on passive vaping by sensitive subgroups of the population are virtually non-existent. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience adverse effects of short-term passive exposure to e-cigarette vape. Here we present the results of preliminary statistical analyses performed before decoding exposures. Methods: In a climate chamber, we performed a double-blinded cross-over study with exposures lasting 3h to passive vaping or clean air among subjects with moderately severe COPD. We studied pulmonary function, exhaled NO and 28 self-reported symptoms before, during and after the exposures. Results: Sixteen patients (6 female; 10 male) with a mean age of 68 years recruited from an outpatient clinic completed the study. At entry the mean FEV1 was 1.43 L (53% of predicted), FVC was 2.53 L (74% of predicted) with a FEV1/FVC ratio of 0.57. FEV1 improved during the exposures and none of the exposures affected lung function negatively. The only symptom reported to be augmented during one compared with the other exposure was “current strength of smell” (p=0.038). Conclusion: Based on the preliminary analysis it appears that at the exposure levels in the present study, pulmonary function in patients with COPD was not affected by passive vaping. The study also suggests that blinding of e-cigarette vape exposure is difficult to obtain due to the odor. It also suggests that the odor itself did not affect lung function.
慢性阻塞性肺病患者被动暴露于电子烟-一项双盲暴露室研究
背景:电子烟的使用在世界范围内持续增长。电子烟比香烟危害小的假设还没有得到适当的研究。特别是,对敏感人群被动吸电子烟的研究几乎不存在。本研究的目的是调查慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者是否会因短期被动接触电子烟而产生不良影响。在这里,我们提出了解码暴露之前进行的初步统计分析的结果。方法:在一个气候室中,我们对中重度COPD患者进行了一项双盲交叉研究,受试者持续暴露于被动电子烟或清洁空气中3小时。我们研究了暴露前、暴露期间和暴露后的肺功能、呼出一氧化氮和28种自我报告的症状。结果:16例患者(女性6例;10名男性),平均年龄68岁,从门诊诊所招募完成研究。进入时平均FEV1为1.43 L(预测的53%),FVC为2.53 L(预测的74%),FEV1/FVC比值为0.57。FEV1在暴露期间有所改善,并且没有任何暴露对肺功能产生负面影响。与另一种暴露相比,报告的唯一症状是“当前气味强度”(p=0.038)。结论:根据初步分析,在本研究的暴露水平下,被动电子烟对COPD患者的肺功能没有影响。该研究还表明,由于电子烟的气味,接触电子烟的致盲性很难获得。研究还表明,气味本身并不影响肺功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信