Printed Instructions in Students’ Materials: A Study of Graduate Students

Mohammad Nurul Islam, Nisar Ahmed Koka, Mohammed Osman Abdul Wahab
{"title":"Printed Instructions in Students’ Materials: A Study of Graduate Students","authors":"Mohammad Nurul Islam, Nisar Ahmed Koka, Mohammed Osman Abdul Wahab","doi":"10.37745/ijelt.13/vol11n35262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers’ verbal treatment of rubrics generally indicate that teachers override the rubric in a number of ways of students’ preferred rubric access strategies revealed that reading the rubric themselves is a utilized strategy ranked after teacher paraphrase and teacher-generated examples. According to the author's past and current studies on rubrics, there is no guarantee that rubrics will be used or required in the way they were intended. Research focusing on materials writers and publishers suggests that the target audience of the rubric is neither clear nor universal, and that, sans rubrics, teachers can be quite innovative in their task interpretations. As part of an on-going examination of various aspects of textbook rubrics, the following study will examine the need for rubrics in student materials of graduate students. It further clarifies the definition and idea of teaching in the context of pedagogy. Finally, this study discusses about introduction, instrumentations, data collection procedures, discussions and conclusion.","PeriodicalId":231165,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37745/ijelt.13/vol11n35262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teachers’ verbal treatment of rubrics generally indicate that teachers override the rubric in a number of ways of students’ preferred rubric access strategies revealed that reading the rubric themselves is a utilized strategy ranked after teacher paraphrase and teacher-generated examples. According to the author's past and current studies on rubrics, there is no guarantee that rubrics will be used or required in the way they were intended. Research focusing on materials writers and publishers suggests that the target audience of the rubric is neither clear nor universal, and that, sans rubrics, teachers can be quite innovative in their task interpretations. As part of an on-going examination of various aspects of textbook rubrics, the following study will examine the need for rubrics in student materials of graduate students. It further clarifies the definition and idea of teaching in the context of pedagogy. Finally, this study discusses about introduction, instrumentations, data collection procedures, discussions and conclusion.
学生材料中的印刷说明:对研究生的研究
教师对标题的言语处理一般表明,教师以多种方式覆盖学生偏爱的标题访问策略,这表明阅读标题本身是一种被使用的策略,排名在教师释义和教师生成的例子之后。根据作者过去和目前对规则的研究,不能保证规则将被使用或要求以它们被预期的方式。针对教材作者和出版商的研究表明,标题的目标受众既不明确也不普遍,而且,没有标题,教师可以在任务解释上相当创新。作为对教科书标题的各个方面进行的检查的一部分,下面的研究将检查研究生的学生材料中对标题的需求。进一步明确了教育学背景下教学的定义和理念。最后,讨论了本研究的绪论、仪器、数据收集步骤、讨论和结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信