Lateral Approach Of Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus As A Better Alternative To Conventional Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block

Arvind Kumar, B. Shadangi, Jitendra Agarwal, V. M. Agnihotri
{"title":"Lateral Approach Of Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus As A Better Alternative To Conventional Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block","authors":"Arvind Kumar, B. Shadangi, Jitendra Agarwal, V. M. Agnihotri","doi":"10.5580/2b97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Supraclavicular brachial plexus block technique, blocks the entire arm distally till mid arm level but risk of pneumothorax, phrenic nerve palsy and vascular puncture could be life threatening so to overcome these sequale we compared the lateral approach of supraclavicular brachial plexus block with conventional approach of supraclavicular block. Methods: Patients were randomly allocated in two groups; group 1 (n=50) received conventional approach of supraclavicular brachial plexus block and group 2 (n= 50) received lateral approach of supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Both the group received lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200000) 7 mg/kg and bupivacaine 2 mg.kg -1. The total volume of drug injected was 30 ml. Results: All the patients were assessed in terms of Time of onset of analgesia, Extent of sensory block, Quality of motor blocked, Tourniquet tolerance, Technical difficulty, Total duration of analgesia, Total duration of motor paralysis, and complications. Appropriate statistical analysis was done. Conclusion: We concluded that the Lateral Approach of Supraclavicular brachial plexus block justifies its own routine clinical uses because it has got better compliance of block in relation to onset, duration, extent and success rate. It is less traumatic and causes less adverse effects like puncture of vessels and pleura.","PeriodicalId":396781,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2b97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose: Supraclavicular brachial plexus block technique, blocks the entire arm distally till mid arm level but risk of pneumothorax, phrenic nerve palsy and vascular puncture could be life threatening so to overcome these sequale we compared the lateral approach of supraclavicular brachial plexus block with conventional approach of supraclavicular block. Methods: Patients were randomly allocated in two groups; group 1 (n=50) received conventional approach of supraclavicular brachial plexus block and group 2 (n= 50) received lateral approach of supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Both the group received lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200000) 7 mg/kg and bupivacaine 2 mg.kg -1. The total volume of drug injected was 30 ml. Results: All the patients were assessed in terms of Time of onset of analgesia, Extent of sensory block, Quality of motor blocked, Tourniquet tolerance, Technical difficulty, Total duration of analgesia, Total duration of motor paralysis, and complications. Appropriate statistical analysis was done. Conclusion: We concluded that the Lateral Approach of Supraclavicular brachial plexus block justifies its own routine clinical uses because it has got better compliance of block in relation to onset, duration, extent and success rate. It is less traumatic and causes less adverse effects like puncture of vessels and pleura.
锁骨上臂丛外侧入路是传统锁骨上臂丛阻滞的更好选择
目的:锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞技术可将整个手臂远端阻滞至臂中部,但有气胸、膈神经麻痹和血管穿刺的危险,为克服这些后遗症,我们比较锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞外侧入路与常规锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞入路。方法:患者随机分为两组;组1 (n=50)采用锁骨上臂丛阻滞常规入路,组2 (n=50)采用锁骨上臂丛阻滞外侧入路。两组均给予肾上腺素加利多卡因(1:20000)7 mg/kg,布比卡因2 mg。公斤1。结果:从镇痛起效时间、感觉阻滞程度、运动阻滞质量、止血带耐受性、技术难度、镇痛总持续时间、运动麻痹总持续时间、并发症等方面对所有患者进行评价。进行了适当的统计分析。结论:锁骨上臂丛阻滞外侧入路在阻滞的起效、持续时间、范围和成功率方面具有较好的顺应性,值得临床常规应用。它的创伤性更小,引起的副作用也更少,比如刺穿血管和胸膜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信