Daniel S. Harrison, M. Naclerio, Kathryn Swider, C. Garrubba, A.T. Yu, Andrew Busler, Lena Liu, Christopher Doughty
{"title":"Education Research: Neurologic Education in Physician Assistant Programs","authors":"Daniel S. Harrison, M. Naclerio, Kathryn Swider, C. Garrubba, A.T. Yu, Andrew Busler, Lena Liu, Christopher Doughty","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A growing number of advanced practice providers (APPs) are entering neurologic practice, and educational initiatives focused on postgraduate training in neurology for these providers are growing in turn. Neurologic education in APP degree programs is not well defined, which limits the ability to tailor these initiatives to the specific needs of APPs. We aim to describe neurologic education in physician assistant (PA) degree programs to better inform these efforts.The 2018 American Academy of Neurology clerkship director survey was adapted for directors of PA programs via an iterative approach. The survey was distributed to program directors (PDs) of accredited programs in Fall 2021 and again in Spring 2022 for nonresponders. Simultaneously, websites of accredited programs were systematically reviewed for content related to neurologic education.Sixty of 255 contacted PDs completed the survey (23.5%). All PDs reported education in selected neuroscience topics. Neuroradiology instruction was included less frequently (66.7%) than neuroanatomy (91.7%) or neurologic examination techniques (95.0%). Twenty-six PDs (43.3%) reported a dedicated neuroscience course; 53 of 260 websites reviewed identified dedicated neuroscience courses (20.8%,k= 0.41). Directors of 10 (38.5%) reported neuroscience courses were neuroscience trained. Only 1 program required a neurology clinical rotation in both the website review (0.4%) and the PD survey (1.7%,k= 1.00). Elective neurology rotations were offered by 51 programs (85.0%) and used by less than 20% of students in 46 programs (92.0%). More programs with dedicated neuroscience didactics (80.0% vs 74.2%) and offerings in clinical neurology (78.7% vs 66.7%) reported graduates pursuing careers in neurology, but these differences were not statistically significant.Survey respondents reported the inclusion of most of the queried preclinical neuroscience topics, typically distributed throughout the curriculum. Dedicated neuroscience courses were less common and most commonly not taught by a neurologist or neurology APP. Clinical neurology rotations are almost never required, but most programs offer an elective. These results suggest opportunities for augmenting neurologic education in APP degree programs, including encouraging students to take clinical neurology rotations and increasing exposure to APPs practicing neurology. These findings additionally inform key targets for postgraduate educational initiatives.","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology: Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
A growing number of advanced practice providers (APPs) are entering neurologic practice, and educational initiatives focused on postgraduate training in neurology for these providers are growing in turn. Neurologic education in APP degree programs is not well defined, which limits the ability to tailor these initiatives to the specific needs of APPs. We aim to describe neurologic education in physician assistant (PA) degree programs to better inform these efforts.The 2018 American Academy of Neurology clerkship director survey was adapted for directors of PA programs via an iterative approach. The survey was distributed to program directors (PDs) of accredited programs in Fall 2021 and again in Spring 2022 for nonresponders. Simultaneously, websites of accredited programs were systematically reviewed for content related to neurologic education.Sixty of 255 contacted PDs completed the survey (23.5%). All PDs reported education in selected neuroscience topics. Neuroradiology instruction was included less frequently (66.7%) than neuroanatomy (91.7%) or neurologic examination techniques (95.0%). Twenty-six PDs (43.3%) reported a dedicated neuroscience course; 53 of 260 websites reviewed identified dedicated neuroscience courses (20.8%,k= 0.41). Directors of 10 (38.5%) reported neuroscience courses were neuroscience trained. Only 1 program required a neurology clinical rotation in both the website review (0.4%) and the PD survey (1.7%,k= 1.00). Elective neurology rotations were offered by 51 programs (85.0%) and used by less than 20% of students in 46 programs (92.0%). More programs with dedicated neuroscience didactics (80.0% vs 74.2%) and offerings in clinical neurology (78.7% vs 66.7%) reported graduates pursuing careers in neurology, but these differences were not statistically significant.Survey respondents reported the inclusion of most of the queried preclinical neuroscience topics, typically distributed throughout the curriculum. Dedicated neuroscience courses were less common and most commonly not taught by a neurologist or neurology APP. Clinical neurology rotations are almost never required, but most programs offer an elective. These results suggest opportunities for augmenting neurologic education in APP degree programs, including encouraging students to take clinical neurology rotations and increasing exposure to APPs practicing neurology. These findings additionally inform key targets for postgraduate educational initiatives.
越来越多的高级实践提供者(app)正在进入神经病学实践,而针对这些提供者的神经病学研究生培训的教育倡议也在不断增长。应用程序学位课程中的神经学教育没有很好的定义,这限制了根据应用程序的具体需求量身定制这些举措的能力。我们的目标是描述医师助理(PA)学位课程的神经学教育,以更好地告知这些努力。2018年美国神经病学学会(American Academy of Neurology)的见习主任调查是通过迭代方法针对私人助理项目主任进行的。该调查于2021年秋季分发给认证项目的项目主管(pd),并于2022年春季再次分发给无应答者。同时,系统地审查了认证项目的网站,以获取与神经学教育相关的内容。在255名联络的警务人员中,有60名(23.5%)完成了调查。所有博士都报告了所选神经科学主题的教育。与神经解剖学(91.7%)或神经检查技术(95.0%)相比,神经放射学指导(66.7%)被纳入的频率较低。26名博士(43.3%)报告了专门的神经科学课程;260个网站中有53个确定了专门的神经科学课程(20.8%,k= 0.41)。10名主任(38.5%)报告神经科学课程受过神经科学培训。在网站评价(0.4%)和PD调查(1.7%,k= 1.00)中,只有1个项目需要神经病学临床轮转。51个项目(85.0%)提供选修神经学轮转,46个项目(92.0%)的学生比例不到20%。更多专门的神经科学教学专业(80.0%对74.2%)和临床神经病学专业(78.7%对66.7%)的毕业生选择神经病学专业,但这些差异在统计上并不显著。调查应答者报告了大多数被询问的临床前神经科学主题,通常分布在整个课程中。专门的神经科学课程不太常见,大多数不是由神经科医生或神经病学APP教授。临床神经病学轮转几乎不需要,但大多数项目都提供选修课。这些结果表明,在APP学位课程中增加神经学教育的机会,包括鼓励学生参加临床神经学轮转和增加APP实践神经学的机会。这些发现还为研究生教育计划的主要目标提供了信息。