Looking at ASEAN Centrality in the Amidst of TPP & RCEP Mega-Regional Competition

Vox Populi Pub Date : 2022-12-19 DOI:10.24252/vp.v5i2.33808
A. Rivai, Gema Ramadhan Bastari
{"title":"Looking at ASEAN Centrality in the Amidst of TPP & RCEP Mega-Regional Competition","authors":"A. Rivai, Gema Ramadhan Bastari","doi":"10.24252/vp.v5i2.33808","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper attempts to understand the progressivity of economic regionalism in Southeast Asia. Unlike previous researches, this paper will explain how the complexity of Southeast Asia region affecting liberalism in ASEAN. This can be seen from how the mega-regional competition between TPP and RCEP hinders ASEAN centrality, signified by the fact that Vietnam, Singapore, Malaysia, and Brunei chose to participate in both cooperation, despite knowing that RCEP should be part of ASEAN centrality agenda. This paper will pay attention on two types of condition: (1) understanding the transformation into mega-regional partnership in Asia-Pacific; (2) understanding the decision of four ASEAN countries who choose to participate in both mega-regional models. The theory which will be used in this paper will be the ‘new trade strategy’ developed by Aggarwal and Lee (2011). In the end, this paper finds that there is a renewal in perception, interest, and domestic institution in the creation of RCEP and TPP. Meanwhile, the decision of Vietnam, Malaysia, Singapore, and Brunei to participate in both RCEP and TPP is the result of rational calculation in terms of economic advantage, political economy, domestic structure improvement, and security. These four calculations can be seen in all country, especially those who utilize greater economic liberalization. ","PeriodicalId":270096,"journal":{"name":"Vox Populi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Populi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24252/vp.v5i2.33808","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper attempts to understand the progressivity of economic regionalism in Southeast Asia. Unlike previous researches, this paper will explain how the complexity of Southeast Asia region affecting liberalism in ASEAN. This can be seen from how the mega-regional competition between TPP and RCEP hinders ASEAN centrality, signified by the fact that Vietnam, Singapore, Malaysia, and Brunei chose to participate in both cooperation, despite knowing that RCEP should be part of ASEAN centrality agenda. This paper will pay attention on two types of condition: (1) understanding the transformation into mega-regional partnership in Asia-Pacific; (2) understanding the decision of four ASEAN countries who choose to participate in both mega-regional models. The theory which will be used in this paper will be the ‘new trade strategy’ developed by Aggarwal and Lee (2011). In the end, this paper finds that there is a renewal in perception, interest, and domestic institution in the creation of RCEP and TPP. Meanwhile, the decision of Vietnam, Malaysia, Singapore, and Brunei to participate in both RCEP and TPP is the result of rational calculation in terms of economic advantage, political economy, domestic structure improvement, and security. These four calculations can be seen in all country, especially those who utilize greater economic liberalization. 
从TPP和RCEP大区域竞争看东盟的中心地位
本文试图了解东南亚地区经济区域主义的渐进性。与以往的研究不同,本文将解释东南亚地区的复杂性如何影响东盟的自由主义。这可以从TPP和RCEP之间的大区域竞争如何阻碍东盟的中心地位中看出,越南、新加坡、马来西亚和文莱尽管知道RCEP应该是东盟中心地位议程的一部分,但却选择参与这两项合作。本文将关注两类条件:(1)理解亚太地区向大区域伙伴关系的转变;(2)了解四个东盟国家选择参与两种大区域模式的决定。本文将使用的理论是Aggarwal和Lee(2011)提出的“新贸易战略”。最后,本文发现,在RCEP和TPP的创建过程中,存在着观念、利益和国内制度的更新。同时,越南、马来西亚、新加坡、文莱决定同时加入RCEP和TPP,是在经济优势、政治经济、国内结构改善和安全等方面进行理性考量的结果。这四个计算在所有国家都可以看到,特别是那些利用更大的经济自由化的国家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信