Thinking SWANA from the -stans: Armenia and Spivak's Other Asias

T. Dolan
{"title":"Thinking SWANA from the -stans: Armenia and Spivak's Other Asias","authors":"T. Dolan","doi":"10.1353/jaas.2023.a901062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In response to a question posed by David Kazanjian and Anahid Kassabian: \"Why is there no Armenian postcolonialism?\" Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak began research that would become \"1994: Will Postcolonialism Travel.\" This article is at the center of the 2008 edited volume Other Asias, which proposes an epistemic reimagining of continentality, race, religion, nationalism, diaspora and empire. Nearly twenty years later, however, Armenians remained especially fraught subjects in the 2020 California Ethnic Studies Model curriculum. Sketching a personal account of curricular debates alongside Spivak's call to theorize \"Other Asias,\" this essay asks, Why is there no Armenian in Ethnic Studies?","PeriodicalId":125906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asian American Studies","volume":"558 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asian American Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jaas.2023.a901062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In response to a question posed by David Kazanjian and Anahid Kassabian: "Why is there no Armenian postcolonialism?" Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak began research that would become "1994: Will Postcolonialism Travel." This article is at the center of the 2008 edited volume Other Asias, which proposes an epistemic reimagining of continentality, race, religion, nationalism, diaspora and empire. Nearly twenty years later, however, Armenians remained especially fraught subjects in the 2020 California Ethnic Studies Model curriculum. Sketching a personal account of curricular debates alongside Spivak's call to theorize "Other Asias," this essay asks, Why is there no Armenian in Ethnic Studies?
从斯坦思考SWANA:亚美尼亚和斯皮瓦克的其他亚洲
摘要:针对David Kazanjian和Anahid Kassabian提出的问题:“为什么没有亚美尼亚后殖民主义?”加亚特里·查克拉沃蒂·斯皮瓦克开始了后来成为《1994:后殖民主义旅行》的研究。本文是2008年编辑的《其他亚洲》一书的核心内容,该书提出了对大陆性、种族、宗教、民族主义、侨民和帝国的认知重新构想。然而,将近20年后,亚美尼亚人在2020年加州种族研究示范课程中仍然是特别令人担忧的科目。在斯皮瓦克呼吁将“其他亚洲人”理论化的同时,这篇文章勾勒出了对课程辩论的个人描述,并问道,为什么在种族研究中没有亚美尼亚人?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信