Learning to Play by the Disclosure Rules: Accuracy of Insider Reports in Canada, 1996-2010

Lindsay M. Tedds, Ryan A. Compton, Christopher C. Nicholls, Daniel Sandler, Caitlin C. Morrison
{"title":"Learning to Play by the Disclosure Rules: Accuracy of Insider Reports in Canada, 1996-2010","authors":"Lindsay M. Tedds, Ryan A. Compton, Christopher C. Nicholls, Daniel Sandler, Caitlin C. Morrison","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2098001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Insiders of Canadian reporting issuers are required to file public reports when they acquire, buy, or sell securities of that reporting issuer. These public reports must be filed using a prescribed form and must be filed within a specific time frame. Failure to file these public reports or filing with inaccurate information constitutes an offence under securities law. The two main objectives served by these reporting rules are: (1) primarily as a regulatory tool to detect or prevent the improper use of undisclosed information by insiders; and (2) to increase market efficiency by providing investors with information concerning the trading activities of an issuer. These objectives are dependent on compliance with the rules, yet no information regarding compliance exists. To investigate compliance a secondary source of information to verify the information provided in public reports must exist. In Canada, the CEO and the top four highest paid executives must report detailed information regarding their compensation, including stock option awards, in the annual report to shareholders. We collect information on stock option grants for these individuals for a sample of Canadian public companies for the period 2003-2011 and compare this information to that provided in the public reports. We find that while the majority of executives properly and accurately file public reports, a significant minority fail to file or file inaccurate information. We consider the consequences of this finding and suggest ways to improve the quality of insider reporting in Canada.","PeriodicalId":243835,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Law eJournal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2098001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Insiders of Canadian reporting issuers are required to file public reports when they acquire, buy, or sell securities of that reporting issuer. These public reports must be filed using a prescribed form and must be filed within a specific time frame. Failure to file these public reports or filing with inaccurate information constitutes an offence under securities law. The two main objectives served by these reporting rules are: (1) primarily as a regulatory tool to detect or prevent the improper use of undisclosed information by insiders; and (2) to increase market efficiency by providing investors with information concerning the trading activities of an issuer. These objectives are dependent on compliance with the rules, yet no information regarding compliance exists. To investigate compliance a secondary source of information to verify the information provided in public reports must exist. In Canada, the CEO and the top four highest paid executives must report detailed information regarding their compensation, including stock option awards, in the annual report to shareholders. We collect information on stock option grants for these individuals for a sample of Canadian public companies for the period 2003-2011 and compare this information to that provided in the public reports. We find that while the majority of executives properly and accurately file public reports, a significant minority fail to file or file inaccurate information. We consider the consequences of this finding and suggest ways to improve the quality of insider reporting in Canada.
学会遵守披露规则:1996-2010年加拿大内幕报告的准确性
加拿大报告发行人的内部人员在收购、购买或出售该报告发行人的证券时,必须提交公开报告。这些公开报告必须使用规定的表格,并必须在特定的时间框架内提交。根据证券法,未提交这些公开报告或提交不准确信息构成犯罪。这些报告规则的两个主要目标是:(1)主要作为一种监管工具,以发现或防止内部人员不当使用未披露的信息;(2)通过向投资者提供有关发行人交易活动的信息来提高市场效率。这些目标取决于对规则的遵守情况,但是没有关于遵守情况的资料。为了调查合规性,必须有二级信息来源来验证公开报告中提供的信息。在加拿大,首席执行官和前四位薪酬最高的高管必须在给股东的年度报告中报告有关其薪酬的详细信息,包括股票期权奖励。我们收集了2003-2011年加拿大上市公司样本中这些个人的股票期权授予信息,并将这些信息与公开报告中提供的信息进行了比较。我们发现,虽然大多数高管正确、准确地提交了公开报告,但有相当一部分高管没有提交或提交了不准确的信息。我们考虑了这一发现的后果,并提出了提高加拿大内幕报告质量的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信