Performance Analysis for 3D Reconstruction Objects in Meshroom and Agisoft - A Comparative Study

I. Enesi, A. Kuqi
{"title":"Performance Analysis for 3D Reconstruction Objects in Meshroom and Agisoft - A Comparative Study","authors":"I. Enesi, A. Kuqi","doi":"10.3991/ijoe.v19i05.37257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"3D reconstruction of objects is with ​​interest nowadays, mainly in production industry. The main challenge of them is accuracy and processing time, especially for small and detailed objects. The field of photogrammetry realizes the 3D reconstruction of objects through 2D photos. Different software, free or non-free exists, providing different quality and performance. Accurate 3D reconstruction is important in cloning objects, especially in the industry of spare parts or in the production of prostheses in medicine, etc. Determining accurately the sizes of the object, especially those with complex geometric shapes is very important in the 3D printing process.                                             \nThe purpose of this paper is the analysis of the performance of 3D reconstruction in terms of accuracy for objects of different sizes regarding the number of its photos and the time evaluation of this process. The 3D reconstruction will be performed by free software Meshroom, measurement will be done in MeshLab and non-free software Agisoft. Experimental results show that quality and performance of 3D reconstruction depends on the number of photos of the object, concluding in finding the optimal balance between these parameters.  By comparing obtained results from MeshRoom and Meshlag versus Agisoft, it is claimed that Agisoft performs better than MeshRoom. It offers more optimization techniques, reduces processing time, more visual quality in the reconstructed 3D object as well as more accuracy in measurement.","PeriodicalId":247144,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Online Biomed. Eng.","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Online Biomed. Eng.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3991/ijoe.v19i05.37257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

3D reconstruction of objects is with ​​interest nowadays, mainly in production industry. The main challenge of them is accuracy and processing time, especially for small and detailed objects. The field of photogrammetry realizes the 3D reconstruction of objects through 2D photos. Different software, free or non-free exists, providing different quality and performance. Accurate 3D reconstruction is important in cloning objects, especially in the industry of spare parts or in the production of prostheses in medicine, etc. Determining accurately the sizes of the object, especially those with complex geometric shapes is very important in the 3D printing process.                                              The purpose of this paper is the analysis of the performance of 3D reconstruction in terms of accuracy for objects of different sizes regarding the number of its photos and the time evaluation of this process. The 3D reconstruction will be performed by free software Meshroom, measurement will be done in MeshLab and non-free software Agisoft. Experimental results show that quality and performance of 3D reconstruction depends on the number of photos of the object, concluding in finding the optimal balance between these parameters.  By comparing obtained results from MeshRoom and Meshlag versus Agisoft, it is claimed that Agisoft performs better than MeshRoom. It offers more optimization techniques, reduces processing time, more visual quality in the reconstructed 3D object as well as more accuracy in measurement.
Meshroom和Agisoft三维重建对象性能分析-比较研究
物体的三维重建是目前人们感兴趣的,主要是在生产行业。它们面临的主要挑战是精度和处理时间,特别是对于小而详细的物体。摄影测量领域通过二维照片实现物体的三维重建。不同的软件,自由的或非自由的存在,提供不同的质量和性能。精确的三维重建在克隆物体,特别是在备件行业或医学假体的生产等方面是重要的。在3D打印过程中,准确地确定物体的尺寸,特别是那些具有复杂几何形状的物体的尺寸是非常重要的。本文的目的是分析三维重建在不同尺寸物体的精度方面的性能,以及对该过程的时间评价。三维重建将由免费软件Meshroom进行,测量将在MeshLab和非免费软件Agisoft进行。实验结果表明,三维重建的质量和性能取决于物体的照片数量,最终找到这些参数之间的最佳平衡。通过比较MeshRoom和Meshlag与Agisoft获得的结果,声称Agisoft的性能优于MeshRoom。它提供了更多的优化技术,减少了处理时间,在重建的3D对象中具有更高的视觉质量以及更高的测量精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信