A Systems Approach to Optimizing Patient Flow During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Elizabeth Korte, Courtney Laughlin, T. Peters, Lillian Stiles, Robert J. Riggs, Kimberly Dowdell, Karen Measells
{"title":"A Systems Approach to Optimizing Patient Flow During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Elizabeth Korte, Courtney Laughlin, T. Peters, Lillian Stiles, Robert J. Riggs, Kimberly Dowdell, Karen Measells","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2020, health systems have been affected by the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, causing an influx of COVID-19 related visits and a sharp decline in non-emergency and elective visits. To mitigate the spread of COVID-19, healthcare systems – including the University of Virginia Health System – reduced ambulatory visits and implemented various social distancing measures, resulting in a drastic change in the patient admittance process. The focus of this work is to accurately characterize the effect of COVID-19 on one of the UVA Internal Medicine, Primary Care clinics, and where possible, to refine and optimize patient flow through the appointment process while accommodating public health restrictions. To achieve these goals, the team adopted a systems approach, which involves the iterative process of problem identification, analysis, and testing recommendations.The first phase of the project focused primarily on establishment of the current state and problem identification. The appointment process contains six major elements: scheduling, sign-in/remote registration, check-in, rooming, check-out, and telemedicine. Through extensive discussions with the clients, surveys of clinic staff, in-person observation, and data collection and analysis, the capstone team was able to understand the pandemic’s impact on the clinic’s patient flow and identify key problem areas at each stage in the appointment process. The team then used these insights to develop informed recommendations for these pain points. The second phase of the project consisted of formulating trials within UVA health restrictions and guidelines to test the impact of our recommendations. Through a pilot of a new remote registration process, on-time patients increased from 68% to 75%, nurse perceived workload decreased significantly, and the arrival process became more predictable. From this work, the team was able to develop a more generic framework for how health systems might assess and address patient flow issues under normal circumstances as well as during future pandemics.","PeriodicalId":426747,"journal":{"name":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In 2020, health systems have been affected by the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, causing an influx of COVID-19 related visits and a sharp decline in non-emergency and elective visits. To mitigate the spread of COVID-19, healthcare systems – including the University of Virginia Health System – reduced ambulatory visits and implemented various social distancing measures, resulting in a drastic change in the patient admittance process. The focus of this work is to accurately characterize the effect of COVID-19 on one of the UVA Internal Medicine, Primary Care clinics, and where possible, to refine and optimize patient flow through the appointment process while accommodating public health restrictions. To achieve these goals, the team adopted a systems approach, which involves the iterative process of problem identification, analysis, and testing recommendations.The first phase of the project focused primarily on establishment of the current state and problem identification. The appointment process contains six major elements: scheduling, sign-in/remote registration, check-in, rooming, check-out, and telemedicine. Through extensive discussions with the clients, surveys of clinic staff, in-person observation, and data collection and analysis, the capstone team was able to understand the pandemic’s impact on the clinic’s patient flow and identify key problem areas at each stage in the appointment process. The team then used these insights to develop informed recommendations for these pain points. The second phase of the project consisted of formulating trials within UVA health restrictions and guidelines to test the impact of our recommendations. Through a pilot of a new remote registration process, on-time patients increased from 68% to 75%, nurse perceived workload decreased significantly, and the arrival process became more predictable. From this work, the team was able to develop a more generic framework for how health systems might assess and address patient flow issues under normal circumstances as well as during future pandemics.
优化COVID-19大流行期间患者流动的系统方法
2020年,卫生系统受到新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)大流行的影响,导致与COVID-19相关的就诊人数激增,非紧急和选择性就诊人数急剧下降。为了缓解COVID-19的传播,包括弗吉尼亚大学卫生系统在内的医疗系统减少了门诊就诊,并实施了各种社交距离措施,导致患者入院流程发生了巨大变化。这项工作的重点是准确描述COVID-19对弗吉尼亚大学内科初级保健诊所的影响,并在可能的情况下,在适应公共卫生限制的同时,通过预约流程改进和优化患者流程。为了实现这些目标,团队采用了一种系统方法,其中包括问题识别、分析和测试建议的迭代过程。项目的第一阶段主要集中于建立当前状态和问题识别。预约流程包含六个主要元素:日程安排、签到/远程注册、登记入住、订房、退房和远程医疗。通过与客户的广泛讨论、对诊所工作人员的调查、亲自观察以及数据收集和分析,顶点小组能够了解大流行对诊所病人流量的影响,并在预约过程的每个阶段确定关键问题领域。然后,团队使用这些见解为这些痛点制定明智的建议。该项目的第二阶段包括在弗吉尼亚大学健康限制和准则范围内制定试验,以测试我们的建议的影响。通过试行一种新的远程挂号流程,准点率从68%增加到75%,护士认为工作量显著减少,到达流程变得更可预测。通过这项工作,该小组能够制定一个更通用的框架,用于卫生系统如何在正常情况下以及在未来大流行期间评估和解决患者流动问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信