Sufism, Attention and Digital Colonization

Doyle Waddick
{"title":"Sufism, Attention and Digital Colonization","authors":"Doyle Waddick","doi":"10.32739/ustad.2023.3.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The contemporary world is being transformed by digitization with social life, politics and economics all in a process of flux. In this article we examine three key concepts, namely attention, the commons and digital colonialism. Attention economics argues that we have far too much information, but not enough attention. The received wisdom goes that attention has become a commodity in extremely short supply compared to the huge quantity of information available. However, the notion of digital commons allows us to imagine attention as a shared resource to be available to all, just as water or air that must be. The notion of digital colonialism allows us to imagine data and attention as resources which huge companies are extracting from human consciousness just as oil and coal are extracted from the earth. Attention is harvested and data extracted from humankind’s activities on digital media to generate profits for giant tech companies such as Meta and Google. However, the deeply rooted ‘mind and body cultivation’ practices of traditional cultures provide another perspective on attention which may not be in such short supply. Indeed, these suggest a different model of attention based on abundance and not scarcity. Foucault refers to such practices as ‘technologies of the self’. This article suggests that Sufi theory and practice can provide creative solutions to the over-solicitation of our minds by the global digital media platforms. The Sufi practice of tawajjuh (turning towards the eternal often through the intermediary form of a guide) allows us to consider the art of orientating attention spiritually as a technology beneficial to the self and others. Furthermore, Sufi practices, while active in knowledge production, are also underpinned by a theory of knowledge, ma‘rifa. An object of knowledge for the social sciences, they are very much active in the production of knowledge. From a normative point of view, the development of a dialogue between Sufism and the social sciences may allow us to imagine the generative abundance rather than an inevitable scarcity of attention. Keywords: Sufism, attention, data colonialism, commons, epistemology, technologies of the self.","PeriodicalId":422995,"journal":{"name":"Üsküdar Üniversitesi Tasavvuf Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Üsküdar Üniversitesi Tasavvuf Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32739/ustad.2023.3.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contemporary world is being transformed by digitization with social life, politics and economics all in a process of flux. In this article we examine three key concepts, namely attention, the commons and digital colonialism. Attention economics argues that we have far too much information, but not enough attention. The received wisdom goes that attention has become a commodity in extremely short supply compared to the huge quantity of information available. However, the notion of digital commons allows us to imagine attention as a shared resource to be available to all, just as water or air that must be. The notion of digital colonialism allows us to imagine data and attention as resources which huge companies are extracting from human consciousness just as oil and coal are extracted from the earth. Attention is harvested and data extracted from humankind’s activities on digital media to generate profits for giant tech companies such as Meta and Google. However, the deeply rooted ‘mind and body cultivation’ practices of traditional cultures provide another perspective on attention which may not be in such short supply. Indeed, these suggest a different model of attention based on abundance and not scarcity. Foucault refers to such practices as ‘technologies of the self’. This article suggests that Sufi theory and practice can provide creative solutions to the over-solicitation of our minds by the global digital media platforms. The Sufi practice of tawajjuh (turning towards the eternal often through the intermediary form of a guide) allows us to consider the art of orientating attention spiritually as a technology beneficial to the self and others. Furthermore, Sufi practices, while active in knowledge production, are also underpinned by a theory of knowledge, ma‘rifa. An object of knowledge for the social sciences, they are very much active in the production of knowledge. From a normative point of view, the development of a dialogue between Sufism and the social sciences may allow us to imagine the generative abundance rather than an inevitable scarcity of attention. Keywords: Sufism, attention, data colonialism, commons, epistemology, technologies of the self.
苏菲主义、注意力和数字殖民
当今世界正在被数字化所改变,社会生活、政治和经济都处于一个变化的过程中。在本文中,我们研究了三个关键概念,即注意力、公地和数字殖民主义。注意力经济学认为,我们拥有太多的信息,却没有足够的注意力。人们普遍认为,与大量可用的信息相比,注意力已经成为一种极其短缺的商品。然而,数字公地的概念让我们可以把注意力想象成一种所有人都可以获得的共享资源,就像水或空气一样。数字殖民主义的概念让我们把数据和注意力想象成大公司从人类意识中提取的资源,就像从地球中提取石油和煤炭一样。在数字媒体上,从人类的活动中获取注意力和数据,为Meta和谷歌等科技巨头创造利润。然而,传统文化中根深蒂固的“身心修炼”实践提供了另一种关注的视角,而这种关注可能并不稀缺。事实上,这表明了一种基于丰富而非稀缺的不同的注意力模式。福柯将这种实践称为“自我的技术”。本文认为,苏菲的理论和实践可以为全球数字媒体平台对我们思想的过度索取提供创造性的解决方案。苏菲的tawajjuh实践(通常通过向导的中介形式转向永恒)使我们能够将精神上定向注意力的艺术视为一种对自我和他人有益的技术。此外,苏菲派的实践虽然活跃于知识生产,但也以知识理论(ma’rifa)为基础。知识的对象为社会科学,他们非常积极地从事知识的生产。从规范的角度来看,苏非主义和社会科学之间对话的发展可能让我们想象产生的丰富性,而不是不可避免的注意力稀缺。关键词:苏菲主义、注意力、数据殖民主义、公地、认识论、自我技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信