Comparative Experimental Study of Multi Label Classification using Single Label Ground Truth with Application to Field Majoring Problem

O. Adikhresna, R. Kusumaningrum, B. Warsito
{"title":"Comparative Experimental Study of Multi Label Classification using Single Label Ground Truth with Application to Field Majoring Problem","authors":"O. Adikhresna, R. Kusumaningrum, B. Warsito","doi":"10.1109/ICICoS48119.2019.8982464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researches on multi label classification methods generally use training data that already have multi label output as ground truth, but there are real-world problems where it is required to produce multi label prediction output but the available training data only have single label as ground truth. This study compared the performance of various multi label classification methods i.e. Ranking Support Vector Machine (Rank-SVM), Backpropagation for Multi Learning (BP-MLL), Multi Label K-Nearest Neighbor (ML-KNN), and Multi Label Radial Basis Function (ML-RBF) that were trained using multi label training data as intended and which were trained using single label training data. The dataset used in this research is an example of real-world problem, namely the personality-aptitude psychological test results is used to predict suitable majors in vocational high school. The results showed that hamming loss between the two was not far adrift so that it can be concluded that in certain problems, multi label classification methods can train single label and still produce multi label predictions with fairly good accuracy.","PeriodicalId":105407,"journal":{"name":"2019 3rd International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 3rd International Conference on Informatics and Computational Sciences (ICICoS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICoS48119.2019.8982464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Researches on multi label classification methods generally use training data that already have multi label output as ground truth, but there are real-world problems where it is required to produce multi label prediction output but the available training data only have single label as ground truth. This study compared the performance of various multi label classification methods i.e. Ranking Support Vector Machine (Rank-SVM), Backpropagation for Multi Learning (BP-MLL), Multi Label K-Nearest Neighbor (ML-KNN), and Multi Label Radial Basis Function (ML-RBF) that were trained using multi label training data as intended and which were trained using single label training data. The dataset used in this research is an example of real-world problem, namely the personality-aptitude psychological test results is used to predict suitable majors in vocational high school. The results showed that hamming loss between the two was not far adrift so that it can be concluded that in certain problems, multi label classification methods can train single label and still produce multi label predictions with fairly good accuracy.
基于单标签真值的多标签分类与应用于现场重大问题的对比实验研究
多标签分类方法的研究一般使用已有多标签输出的训练数据作为基础真值,但现实世界中存在需要产生多标签预测输出,而现有训练数据只有单一标签作为基础真值的问题。本研究比较了各种多标签分类方法的性能,即排名支持向量机(Rank-SVM)、反向传播多学习(BP-MLL)、多标签k近邻(ML-KNN)和多标签径向基函数(ML-RBF),这些方法使用多标签训练数据进行训练,使用单标签训练数据进行训练。本研究使用的数据集是一个现实问题的例子,即人格倾向心理测试结果用于预测职业高中的合适专业。结果表明,两者之间的汉明损失相差不大,因此可以得出结论,在某些问题中,多标签分类方法可以训练单个标签,并且仍然可以产生相当好的多标签预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信