Trade and Welfare Effects of Export Tax: Theory and Evidence from China's Incomplete Export VAT Rebate

Eric W. Bond, Yuwan Duan, Ting Ji, Yi Lu
{"title":"Trade and Welfare Effects of Export Tax: Theory and Evidence from China's Incomplete Export VAT Rebate","authors":"Eric W. Bond, Yuwan Duan, Ting Ji, Yi Lu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3881450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While China was reducing tariffs as part of the WTO accession process, it was also effectively restricting exports in some sectors by reducing the rebates of the value added tax (VAT) for exporters. We use a multi-sector multi-country Ricardian model to examine the extent to which these de facto export tax changes benefited China and nullified the benefits to the rest of the world of China’s trade liberalization. We show that trade liberalization benefited China’s trade partners both through an improvement in their terms of trade and through a reallocation of resources from protected imported sectors to exportable sectors. We find that the partial rebate policy on VAT exports provided a small effect overall on the welfare of China and trading partners, although some countries lost as much as 2/3 of their gain from China’s liberalization based on tariffs alone. We also use our model to solve for China’s optimal export taxes and calculate the impact of optimal export taxes on China and the rest of the world.","PeriodicalId":103245,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Trade Law (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3881450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While China was reducing tariffs as part of the WTO accession process, it was also effectively restricting exports in some sectors by reducing the rebates of the value added tax (VAT) for exporters. We use a multi-sector multi-country Ricardian model to examine the extent to which these de facto export tax changes benefited China and nullified the benefits to the rest of the world of China’s trade liberalization. We show that trade liberalization benefited China’s trade partners both through an improvement in their terms of trade and through a reallocation of resources from protected imported sectors to exportable sectors. We find that the partial rebate policy on VAT exports provided a small effect overall on the welfare of China and trading partners, although some countries lost as much as 2/3 of their gain from China’s liberalization based on tariffs alone. We also use our model to solve for China’s optimal export taxes and calculate the impact of optimal export taxes on China and the rest of the world.
出口税的贸易与福利效应:来自中国不完全出口退税的理论与证据
虽然中国在加入世贸组织的过程中降低了关税,但它也通过减少出口商的增值税退税,有效地限制了某些行业的出口。我们使用多部门多国李嘉图模型来检验这些事实上的出口税收变化在多大程度上使中国受益,并使中国贸易自由化对世界其他地区的利益无效。我们的研究表明,贸易自由化不仅通过改善贸易条件,而且通过将资源从受保护的进口部门重新配置到出口部门,使中国的贸易伙伴受益。我们发现,增值税出口的部分退税政策对中国和贸易伙伴的福利总体上影响很小,尽管一些国家仅基于关税就损失了中国自由化所带来的三分之二的收益。本文还利用该模型求解了中国的最优出口税,并计算了最优出口税对中国和世界的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信