{"title":"Anomaly Based Detection for Identifying R2L (Remote to Local) Attacks Using RNN-LSTM in Comparison with ANN for Reducing False Alarm Rate","authors":"B. Hemasree, D. N","doi":"10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10084242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Detection of the higher false alarm rate using Novel RNN-LSTM is the objective of this work. Materials and Methods: Classification of anomaly based detection is done for identifying remote to local attacks using recurrent neural networks with sample size of (N=52) in which 26 samples are for RNN and 26 samples are for ANN and both the techniques are compared and results are obtained using the G-power value 0.80. Results and Discussion: The proposed work used Novel RNN-LSTM from the NSL-KDD dataset network anomaly detection has accuracy 71% as well as ANN accuracy 66.08%. Significance value becomes 0.006 $(\\mathbf{p} < \\mathbf{0.05})$. Conclusion: Novel RNN-LSTM gives an accuracy which is better compared with ANN.","PeriodicalId":436733,"journal":{"name":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Knowledge Discovery in Concurrent Engineering (ICECONF)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECONF57129.2023.10084242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Detection of the higher false alarm rate using Novel RNN-LSTM is the objective of this work. Materials and Methods: Classification of anomaly based detection is done for identifying remote to local attacks using recurrent neural networks with sample size of (N=52) in which 26 samples are for RNN and 26 samples are for ANN and both the techniques are compared and results are obtained using the G-power value 0.80. Results and Discussion: The proposed work used Novel RNN-LSTM from the NSL-KDD dataset network anomaly detection has accuracy 71% as well as ANN accuracy 66.08%. Significance value becomes 0.006 $(\mathbf{p} < \mathbf{0.05})$. Conclusion: Novel RNN-LSTM gives an accuracy which is better compared with ANN.