A Comparison between Three-Phase Conventional Two-Stage AC-DC and Single-Stage Matrix Converter Approaches

Parham Mohseni, Pietro Emiliani, O. Husev, D. Vinnikov, L. Mackay
{"title":"A Comparison between Three-Phase Conventional Two-Stage AC-DC and Single-Stage Matrix Converter Approaches","authors":"Parham Mohseni, Pietro Emiliani, O. Husev, D. Vinnikov, L. Mackay","doi":"10.1109/CPE-POWERENG58103.2023.10227438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing popularity of Electric Vehicles (EVs) makes a growing need to build energy-efficient battery chargers to charge EVs batteries faster than before. Newly designed EVs have larger battery capacities and higher voltage ranges than their previous versions. Therefore, the recent onboard battery pack voltages are increased to 700-800 V ranges, to increase the battery capacities and reduce the charging time. On-Board Chargers (OBCs) are an essential part of plug-in battery EVs and hybrid vehicles. The most recent stage in the technological development of the available battery chargers is the two-stage approach. In this paper, the available two-stage ac-dc approach and single-stage matrix converter are compared comprehensively in terms of size, efficiency, and applicability to see which approach is more efficient. Finally, both of the structures are simulated in PSIM software with 12 kW output power, 800 V battery voltage, 100 kHz high switching frequency, and three-phase 50 Hz and 230 V grid to validate the theoretical analysis.","PeriodicalId":315989,"journal":{"name":"2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 IEEE 17th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPE-POWERENG58103.2023.10227438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The growing popularity of Electric Vehicles (EVs) makes a growing need to build energy-efficient battery chargers to charge EVs batteries faster than before. Newly designed EVs have larger battery capacities and higher voltage ranges than their previous versions. Therefore, the recent onboard battery pack voltages are increased to 700-800 V ranges, to increase the battery capacities and reduce the charging time. On-Board Chargers (OBCs) are an essential part of plug-in battery EVs and hybrid vehicles. The most recent stage in the technological development of the available battery chargers is the two-stage approach. In this paper, the available two-stage ac-dc approach and single-stage matrix converter are compared comprehensively in terms of size, efficiency, and applicability to see which approach is more efficient. Finally, both of the structures are simulated in PSIM software with 12 kW output power, 800 V battery voltage, 100 kHz high switching frequency, and three-phase 50 Hz and 230 V grid to validate the theoretical analysis.
传统三相两级交直流与单级矩阵变换器的比较
随着电动汽车(ev)的日益普及,越来越需要制造节能电池充电器,以便比以前更快地为电动汽车电池充电。新设计的电动汽车比之前的版本拥有更大的电池容量和更高的电压范围。因此,最近的车载电池组电压增加到700-800 V范围,以增加电池容量并减少充电时间。车载充电器(OBCs)是插电式电动汽车和混合动力汽车的重要组成部分。现有电池充电器技术发展的最新阶段是两阶段方法。本文对现有的两级交直流变换器和单级矩阵变换器在尺寸、效率和适用性方面进行了全面比较,以确定哪种变换器效率更高。最后,在PSIM软件中对两种结构进行了12 kW输出功率、800 V电池电压、100 kHz高开关频率、50 Hz和230 V三相电网的仿真,验证了理论分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信